Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35623397›Full record

ArticleMathematical biosciences2022

R Markdown as a dynamic interface for teaching: Modules from math and biology classrooms.

Kristine L Grayson, Angela K Hilliker, Joanna R Wares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mathematical biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristine L GraysonDepartment of Biology, University of Richmond, United States of America.
Angela K HillikerDepartment of Biology, University of Richmond, United States of America.
Joanna R WaresDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Richmond, United States of America. Electronic address: jwares@richmond.edu.

Funding

Investigating the Regulation of Ded1 in Translation and RNA StorageR15GM128068 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND · PI HILLIKER, ANGELA · 2018 to 2018
$406k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM128068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancing technologies, including interactive tools, are changing classroom pedagogy across academia. Here, we discuss the R Markdown interface, which allows for the creation of partial or complete interactive classroom modules for courses using the R programming language. R Markdown files mix sections of R code with formatted text, including LaTeX, which are rendered together to form complete reports and documents. These features allow instructors to create classroom modules that guide students through concepts, while providing areas for coding and text response by students. Students can also learn to create their own reports for more independent assignments. After presenting the features and uses of R Markdown to enhance teaching and learning, we present examples of materials from two courses. In a Computational Modeling course for math students, we used R Markdown to guide students through exploring mathematical models to understand the principle of herd immunity. In a Data Visualization and Communication course for biology students, we used R Markdown for teaching the fundamentals of R programming and graphing, and for students to learn to create reproducible data investigations. Through these examples, we demonstrate the benefits of R Markdown as a dynamic teaching and learning tool.

Indexed as

LearningStudentsBiologyHumansData visualizationHerd immunityPedagogyR markdownTeaching programming

Identifiers

PMID35623397
PMCPMC9487201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.