Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35623338›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2022

Development and Evaluation of Pediatric Versions of the Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale for Children With Hearing Loss.

Benjamin W Y Hornsby, Stephen Camarata, Sun-Joo Cho, Hilary Davis, Ronan McGarrigle, Fred H Bess

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Benjamin W Y HornsbyDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0001-6518-2747
Stephen CamarataDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-3342-1747
Sun-Joo ChoDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-2600-8305
Hilary DavisDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-8323-4691
Ronan McGarrigleDepartment of Psychology, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1704-1135
Fred H BessDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-4833-4507
Google (United States) · US

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGrowing evidence suggests that fatigue associated with listening difficulties is particularly problematic for children with hearing loss (CHL). However, sensitive, reliable, and valid measures of listening-related fatigue do not exist. To address this gap, this article describes the development, psychometric evaluation, and preliminary validation of a suite of scales designed to assess listening-related fatigue in CHL: the pediatric versions of the Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale (VFS-Peds).

methodTest development employed best practices, including operationalizing the construct of listening-related fatigue from the perspective of target respondents (i.e., children, their parents, and teachers). Test items were developed based on input from these groups. Dimensionality was evaluated using exploratory factor analyses (EFAs). Item response theory (IRT) and differential item functioning (DIF) analyses were used to identify high-quality items, which were further evaluated and refined to create the final versions of the VFS-Peds.

resultsThe VFS-Peds is appropriate for use with children aged 6-17 years and consists of child self-report (VFS-C), parent proxy-report (VFS-P), and teacher proxy-report (VFS-T) scales. EFA of child self-report and teacher proxy data suggested that listening-related fatigue was unidimensional in nature. In contrast, parent data suggested a multidimensional construct, composed of mental (cognitive, social, and emotional) and physical domains. IRT analyses suggested that items were of good quality, with high information and good discriminability. DIF analyses revealed the scales provided a comparable measure of fatigue regardless of the child's gender, age, or hearing status. Test information was acceptable over a wide range of fatigue severities and all scales yielded acceptable reliability and validity.

conclusionsThis article describes the development, psychometric evaluation, and validation of the VFS-Peds. Results suggest that the VFS-Peds provide a sensitive, reliable, and valid measure of listening-related fatigue in children that may be appropriate for clinical use. Such scales could be used to identify those children most affected by listening-related fatigue, and given their apparent sensitivity, the scales may also be useful for examining the effectiveness of potential interventions targeting listening-related fatigue in children. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19836154.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionHearing LossMental FatigueSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentChildHumansParentsProxyPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSchool Teachers

Identifiers

PMID35623338
PMCPMC9907440
OpenAlexW4281852059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.