Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35623298›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2022

Spinal cord regeneration - the origins of progenitor cells for functional rebuilding.

Sarah E Walker, Karen Echeverri

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The endocannabinoid system regulates both ependymoglial and neuronal cell responses to a tail amputation in the axolotl.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. MicroRNAs in Tissue Regeneration: Lessons from Animal Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Age-dependent regenerative mechanisms in the brain.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah E WalkerMarine Biological Laboratory, Eugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology and Tissue Engineering, 7 MBL Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/EcheverriLab.
Karen EcheverriMarine Biological Laboratory, Eugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology and Tissue Engineering, 7 MBL Street, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA. Electronic address: kecheverri@mbl.edu.
Marine Biological Laboratory · US

Funding

Regulation of scar free wound healing in salamandersR01HD092451 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ECHEVERRI, KAREN · 2017 to 2021
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD092451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spinal cord is one of the most important structures for all vertebrate animals as it connects almost all parts of the body to the brain. Injury to the mammalian spinal cord has devastating consequences, resulting in paralysis with little to no hope of recovery. In contrast, other vertebrate animals have been known for centuries to be capable of functionally regenerating large lesions in the spinal cord. Here, we will review the current knowledge of spinal cord regeneration and recent work in different proregenerative animals that has begun to shed light on the cellular and molecular mechanisms these animals use to direct cells to rebuild a complex, functional spinal cord.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord RegenerationAnimalsMammalsNerve RegenerationStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID35623298
PMCPMC9878350
OpenAlexW4281383178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.