ArticleJCO global oncology2022
Where Are We Dying? Ethnic Differences in Place of Death Among New Zealanders Dying of Cancer.
Article in JCO global oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in place of death in Peru, 2017-2024: a nationwide analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Definition of failure to rescue in gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancer surgery: national cohort study.BJS open · 2025Article
- Inequities in 'failure to rescue' for Indigenous Māori after gastrointestinal cancer surgery in New Zealand.The British journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Mortality from malignant neoplasms at home and in hospitals in Brazil, 2002-2022: sociodemographic characteristics and temporal trends.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- The epidemiology of dying within 48 hours of presentation to emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study of older people across Australia and New Zealand.Age and ageing · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAround a third of people with cancer will die outside of their preferred place of death, with substantial variation occurring between and within countries in terms of place of death. Here, we examine place of death within the New Zealand cancer context, with specific focus on differences between Indigenous Māori and other ethnic groups.
methodsUsing national-level data, we identified all those who died in New Zealand between 2007 and 2018 of cancer (N = 107,373), stratified by ethnicity and cancer type, and linked these patients to national health and mortality records. We then described the crude and age-standardized proportions of cancer deaths by location separately by ethnic group, and conducted logistic regression to compare odds of death within a given location between ethnic groups.
resultsAfter adjusting for age, sex, and deprivation, we found that Māori people with cancer are more likely to die in a private residence than Europeans (46%
conclusionIt remains unclear whether these differences reflect differences in preferences for place of death between ethnic groups, or whether they reflect differences in access to appropriate supportive care. Further research is required to examine these differences in greater detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.