Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35622896›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Pruning recurrent neural networks replicates adolescent changes in working memory and reinforcement learning.

Bruno B Averbeck

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early psychosocial deprivation alters the refinement of neural dynamics across adolescence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trajectories of Response Inhibition Development in Adolescence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Shaping dynamical neural computations using spatiotemporal constraints.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2024
    Review
  13. Cognitive Control and Neural Activity during Human Development: Evidence for Synaptic Pruning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  14. Navigating Pubertal Goldilocks: The Optimal Pace for Hierarchical Brain Organization.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Changes in Behavior and Neural Dynamics across Adolescent Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The neuroconnectionist research programme.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bruno B AverbeckLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4415.ORCID 0000-0002-3976-8565
National Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

Frontal Striatal Systems and Dopamine in Normal and Pathological BehaviorZIAMH002928 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI AVERBECK, BRUNO · 2010 to 2025
$29.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescent development is characterized by an improvement in multiple cognitive processes. While performance on cognitive operations improves during this period, the ability to learn new skills quickly, for example, a new language, decreases. During this time, there is substantial pruning of excitatory synapses in cortex and specifically in prefrontal cortex. We have trained a series of recurrent neural networks to solve a working memory task and a reinforcement learning (RL) task. Performance on both of these tasks is known to improve during adolescence. After training, we pruned the networks by removing weak synapses. Pruning was done incrementally, and the networks were retrained during pruning. We found that pruned networks trained on the working memory task were more resistant to distraction. The pruned RL networks were able to produce more accurate value estimates and also make optimal choices more consistently. Both results are consistent with developmental improvements on these tasks. Pruned networks, however, learned some, but not all, new problems more slowly. Thus, improvements in task performance can come at the cost of flexibility. Our results show that overproduction and subsequent pruning of synapses is a computationally advantageous approach to building a competent brain.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentMemory, Short-TermNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronal PlasticityReinforcement, PsychologySynapsesAdolescentHumansModels, NeurologicalPrefrontal Cortexneural networkpruningreinforcement learningworking memory

Identifiers

PMID35622896
PMCPMC9295803
OpenAlexW4281706755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.