Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35622871›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Performance of a rapid immuno-chromatographic test (Schistosoma ICT IgG-IgM) for detecting Schistosoma-specific antibodies in sera of endemic and non-endemic populations.

Julie Hoermann, Esther Kuenzli, Carmen Schaefer, Daniel H Paris, Silja Bühler, Peter Odermatt, Somphou Sayasone, Andreas Neumayr, Beatrice Nickel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Julie HoermannSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2059-8033
Esther KuenzliSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Carmen SchaeferSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel H ParisSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4743-5987
Silja BühlerDivision of Hygiene and Infectious Diseases, Institute for Hygiene and Environment, Hamburg, Germany.
Peter OdermattSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Somphou SayasoneDepartment of International Program for Health in the Tropics, Lao Tropical and Public Health Institute, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8219-9567
Andreas NeumayrSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7358-2791
Beatrice NickelSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2732-2643
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHInstitut für Hygiene und Umwelt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchistosomiasis, an acute and chronic parasitic disease caused by human pathogenic Schistosoma species, is a neglected tropical disease affecting more than 220 million people worldwide. For diagnosis of schistosomiasis, stool and urine microscopy for egg detection is still the recommended method, however sensitivity of these methods is limited. Therefore, other methods like molecular detection of DNA in stool, detection of circulating cathodic antigen in urine or circulating anodic antigen in urine and serum, as well as serological tests have gained more attention. This study examines the sensitivity and specificity of a rapid diagnostic test based on immunochromatography (Schistosoma ICT IgG-IgM, LD Bio, Lyon, France) for simultaneous detection of specific IgG and IgM antibodies in serum, against Schistosoma spp. in endemic and non-endemic populations. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsFrozen banked serum samples from patients with confirmed schistosomiasis, patients with other helminth infections, patients with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis and healthy blood donors were used to assess the sensitivity and the specificity of the Schistosoma ICT IgG-IgM rapid diagnostic test. The test showed a sensitivity of 100% in patients with parasitologically confirmed schistosomiasis, irrespective of the species (S. mansoni, S. haematobium, S. japonicum, S. mekongi). In healthy blood donors and patients with rheumatoid factor positive rheumatoid arthritis from Europe, specificity was 100%. However, in serum samples of patients with other tissue invasive helminth infections, the test showed some cross-reactivity, resulting in a specificity of 85%. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: With its high sensitivity, the Schistosoma ICT IgG-IgM rapid diagnostic test is a suitable screening test for detection of Schistosoma specific antibodies, including S. mekongi. However, in populations with a high prevalence of co-infection with other tissue invasive helminths, positive results should be confirmed with other diagnostic assays due to the test's imperfect specificity.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidSchistosomiasisSchistosomiasis mansoniAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthFecesHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMicroscopySchistosoma mansoniSensitivity and SpecificityUrinalysisAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin M

Identifiers

PMID35622871
PMCPMC9212132
OpenAlexW4281708793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.