ArticlePLoS biology2022
Neural networks enable efficient and accurate simulation-based inference of evolutionary parameters from adaptation dynamics.
Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collective posterior inference from highly variable empirical replicates.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Segmental copy number amplifications are more stable than aneuploidies in the absence of selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Neural posterior estimation on exponential random graph models: evaluating bias and implementation challenges.Statistics and computing · 2026Article
- Template switching during DNA replication is a prevalent source of adaptive gene amplification.eLife · 2025Article
- Template switching during DNA replication is a prevalent source of adaptive gene amplification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Aneuploidy Can Be an Evolutionary Diversion on the Path to Adaptation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- The Dynamic Fungal Genome: Polyploidy, Aneuploidy and Copy Number Variation in Response to Stress.Annual review of microbiology · 2023Review
- Simulation-based inference for efficient identification of generative models in computational connectomics.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Copy number variation alters local and global mutational tolerance.Genome research · 2023Article
- Barcoding Populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Article
- Best Practices in Microbial Experimental Evolution: Using Reporters and Long-Read Sequencing to Identify Copy Number Variation in Experimental Evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Review
- Mutation rate, selection, and epistasis inferred from RNA virus haplotypes via neural posterior estimation.Virus evolution · 2023Article
- Challenges and potential solutions for studying the genetic and phenotypic architecture of adaptation in microbes.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rate of adaptive evolution depends on the rate at which beneficial mutations are introduced into a population and the fitness effects of those mutations. The rate of beneficial mutations and their expected fitness effects is often difficult to empirically quantify. As these 2 parameters determine the pace of evolutionary change in a population, the dynamics of adaptive evolution may enable inference of their values. Copy number variants (CNVs) are a pervasive source of heritable variation that can facilitate rapid adaptive evolution. Previously, we developed a locus-specific fluorescent CNV reporter to quantify CNV dynamics in evolving populations maintained in nutrient-limiting conditions using chemostats. Here, we use CNV adaptation dynamics to estimate the rate at which beneficial CNVs are introduced through de novo mutation and their fitness effects using simulation-based likelihood-free inference approaches. We tested the suitability of 2 evolutionary models: a standard Wright-Fisher model and a chemostat model. We evaluated 2 likelihood-free inference algorithms: the well-established Approximate Bayesian Computation with Sequential Monte Carlo (ABC-SMC) algorithm, and the recently developed Neural Posterior Estimation (NPE) algorithm, which applies an artificial neural network to directly estimate the posterior distribution. By systematically evaluating the suitability of different inference methods and models, we show that NPE has several advantages over ABC-SMC and that a Wright-Fisher evolutionary model suffices in most cases. Using our validated inference framework, we estimate the CNV formation rate at the GAP1 locus in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to be 10-4.7 to 10-4 CNVs per cell division and a fitness coefficient of 0.04 to 0.1 per generation for GAP1 CNVs in glutamine-limited chemostats. We experimentally validated our inference-based estimates using 2 distinct experimental methods-barcode lineage tracking and pairwise fitness assays-which provide independent confirmation of the accuracy of our approach. Our results are consistent with a beneficial CNV supply rate that is 10-fold greater than the estimated rates of beneficial single-nucleotide mutations, explaining the outsized importance of CNVs in rapid adaptive evolution. More generally, our study demonstrates the utility of novel neural network-based likelihood-free inference methods for inferring the rates and effects of evolutionary processes from empirical data with possible applications ranging from tumor to viral evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.