Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35622821›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

An effective up-sampling approach for breast cancer prediction with imbalanced data: A machine learning model-based comparative analysis.

Tuan Tran, Uyen Le, Yihui Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Machine Learning Models to Predict Future Frailty in Community-Dwelling Middle-Aged and Older Adults: The ELSA Cohort Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tuan TranCollege of Pharmacy, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4735-7253
Uyen LeCollege of Pharmacy, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, CA, United States of America.
Yihui ShiCollege of Medicine, California Northstate University, Elk Grove, CA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of breast cancer plays a critical role in successful treatment that saves thousands of lives of patients every year. Despite massive clinical data have been collected and stored by healthcare organizations, only a small portion of the data has been used to support decision-making for treatments. In this study, we proposed an engineered up-sampling method (ENUS) for handling imbalanced data to improve predictive performance of machine learning models. Our experiment results showed that when the ratio of the minority to the majority class is less than 20%, training models with ENUS improved the balanced accuracy 3.74%, sensitivity 8.36% and F1 score 3.83%. Our study also identified that XGBoost Tree (XGBTree) using ENUS achieved the best performance with an average balanced accuracy of 97.47% (min = 93%, max = 100%), sensitivity of 97.88% (min = 89% and max = 100%), and F1 score of 96.20% (min = 89.5%, max = 100%) in the validation dataset. Furthermore, our ensemble algorithm identified Cell_Shape and Nuclei as the most important attributes in predicting breast cancer. The finding re-affirms the previous knowledge of the relationship between Cell_Shape, Nuclei, and the grades of breast cancer using a data-driven approach. Finally, our experiment showed that Random Forest and Neural Network models had the least training time. Our study provided a comprehensive comparison of a wide range of machine learning methods in predicting breast cancer risk. It can be used as a tool for healthcare practitioners to effectively detect and treat breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35622821
PMCPMC9140301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.