ArticleJournal of ultrasound2023
Prediction of mode of delivery by an ultrasound score similar to Bishop score and performance of independent predictors.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of intrapartum ultrasound on mode of delivery guidance and adverse pregnancy outcomes in primigravidae undergoing vaginal trial labor.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Trial
- Development and validation of a predictive nomogram for cesarean delivery in term singleton pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age undergoing labor induction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A multimodal model in the prediction of the delivery mode using data from a digital twin-empowered labor monitoring system.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is evolving literature on the superiority of transperineal ultrasound (TPU) in predicting the mode of delivery either before induction or during the course of labour. An ultrasound score (USG score) similar to a Bishop score or an ultrasound scoring method based on independent predictors before the onset of labour at term gestation would serve as a baseline objective record over which further progress of labour could be evaluated.
objective1. To sonographically examine the clinical parameters evaluated during a digital examination. 2. To derive an USG score using TPU parameters, similar to a Bishop score, and determine its performance in predicting pregnancy outcomes. 3. To identify which are the independent predictors of caesarean section among all the studied ultrasound (USG) parameters. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective study, all the eligible women who came for routine antenatal care at term gestation and who were due for pelvic assessment were recruited. They underwent transabdominal ultrasound (TAS) for evaluating head position and head circumference, and TPU for evaluating head station with and without applying fundal pressure, various cervical parameters, sub pubic angle. Equivalent five USG parameters were scored along similar lines as the Bishop score. These women underwent vaginal examination for Bishop score and pelvic adequacy by an obstetrician who was blinded about USG parameters. While spontaneous onset of labour (SOL) was awaited in some of these women, some were induced as and when indicated. After delivery, the Bishop scores, pregnancy outcome in terms of SOL or induction of labour (IOL), mode of delivery and duration of labour were noted retrospectively from case records. Independent predictors of caesarean were obtained by univariate and multivariate analysis.
resultsAll the parameters were assessed for predictive ability of caesarean section by univariate analysis. The cervical length, angle of progression (AOP) at rest, head perineal distance (HPD) at rest and with pressure, Bishop score and USG score were found significant. On multivariate analysis, cervix length and USG score were found to be statistically significant. At a USG score of ≤ 5, the sensitivity and specificity to predict caesarean section were 84% and 68%, respectively. The relative risk (RR) was 4.9 (95% CI 2.3-12). The USG score could predict SOL. The p value was 0.001. The area under the curve (AUC) for the ultrasound score was 0.74.
conclusionsUSG examination by USG score at term gestation before the onset of labour can predict mode of delivery by caesarean section. It can predict spontaneous onset of labour. However, among all the individual parameters, cervix length has best predictive ability for caesarean section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.