Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35622254›Full record

ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2022

Minimally Manipulated Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Can Be Used for Tissue Engineering In Situ and Simultaneous Formation of Personalized Tissue Models.

D S Baranovskii, B G Akhmedov, A G Demchenko, M E Krasheninnikov, M V Balyasin, O Yu Pavlova, N S Serova, O A Krasil'nikova, P V Shegai, A D Kaprin and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. First Experience of PersonalizedInternational journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

D S BaranovskiiNational Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
B G AkhmedovA. V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
A G DemchenkoN. P. Bochkov Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Moscow, Russia.
M E KrasheninnikovPeoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
M V BalyasinPeoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
O Yu PavlovaI. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
N S SerovaI. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
O A Krasil'nikovaNational Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
P V ShegaiNational Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
A D KaprinNational Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
I D KlabukovNational Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia. ilya.klabukov@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Red bone marrow and autologous bone tissue (bone fragments and bone chips) of the donor were harvested intraoperatively during autoplasty of talus bone defect. Titanium chips were obtained by grinding a fragment of a microporous titanium-coated hip arthroplasty (Zimmer). Bone marrow mononuclear cells were isolated in the operating room, and bone and titanium fragments were incubated with a suspension of mononuclear cells. The quality of revitalization was assessed by fluorescence microscopy and histological examination after culturing of adherent cells on the bone and titanium fragments. During culturing on bone chips, bone marrow mononuclear fraction cells demonstrated significantly higher metabolic activity than bone marrow cells (p=0.04). Mononuclear fraction cells were also capable of stable colonization of titanium fragments with the formation of composite tissue model.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringTitaniumBone MarrowBone Marrow CellsTransplantation, AutologousTitaniumbone marrow mononuclear cellsbone regenerationin situtissue engineeringtissue models

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.