Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35622185›Full record

Trial reportThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2023

Cost-effectiveness of the MitraClip device in German heart failure patients with secondary mitral regurgitation.

Bent Estler, Volker Rudolph, Yana Seleznova, Arim Shukri, Stephanie Stock, Dirk Müller

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cost-effectiveness of the MitraClip device in secondary mitral regurgitation: comment upon the article by Estler et al.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bent EstlerInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923, Cologne, Germany. bent.estler@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-4557
Volker RudolphHeart & Diabetes Centre NRW, General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Chelsea, Germany.
Yana SeleznovaInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany.
Arim ShukriInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany.
Stephanie StockInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923, Cologne, Germany.
Dirk MüllerInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Str. 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEHeart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the MitraClip device (MitraClip) in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation in Germany. METHODS AND

resultsA model-based economic evaluation was performed to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for patients with a moderate-to-severe or severe secondary mitral regurgitation receiving MitraClip plus OMT compared with OMT alone from the statutory health insurance (SHI) perspective. Transition probabilities, data on survival rates, and hospitalization rates were obtained from the COAPT trial, a randomized-controlled multicenter trial. Data on health utility and costs were taken from published evidence. To assess parameter uncertainty, several deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. The incremental costs per QALY gained were € 59,728 (costs/incremental life years gained: € 42,360). The results were most sensitive to the transition probabilities and the hospitalization rates. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the MitraClip strategy was cost-effective with a probability of 80% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of € 67,000/QALY.

conclusionsDepending on the willingness-to-pay threshold, for patients with heart failure and a moderate-to-severe or severe secondary mitral regurgitation the MitraClip can be cost-effective from the perspective of the German SHI.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationMitral Valve InsufficiencyCost-Benefit AnalysisGermanyHumansTreatment OutcomeCost-effectivenessGermanyHeart failureMitraClipSecondary mitral regurgitationTranscatheter-valve repair

Identifiers

PMID35622185
PMCPMC10060324
OpenAlexW4281977150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.