Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35622154›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Combined anterior-posterior versus all-posterior approaches for adult spinal deformity correction: a matched control study.

Sleiman Haddad, Alba Vila-Casademunt, Çaglar Yilgor, Susana Nuñez-Pereira, Manuel Ramirez, Javier Pizones, Ahmet Alanay, Frank Kleinstuck, Ibrahim Obeid, Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nationwide analysis of spinal surgery in Japan from 1994 to 2021.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Readmission rate after adult scoliosis surgery on primary cases over 45 years-old with long term follow-up.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbosacral fractional curve correction in degenerative lumbar scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sleiman HaddadSpine Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain. sleimanhaddad@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3662-9009
Alba Vila-CasademuntSpine Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Çaglar YilgorDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Susana Nuñez-PereiraSpine Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Manuel RamirezSpine Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier PizonesSpine Surgery Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Ahmet AlanayDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Frank KleinstuckSpine Center Division, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ibrahim ObeidSpine Surgery Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-GruesoSpine Surgery Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Ferran PelliséSpine Research Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
European Spine Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnterior approaches are gaining popularity for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgeries especially with the introduction of hyperlordotic cages and improvement in MIS techniques. Combined Approaches provide powerful segmental sagittal correction potential and increase the surface area available for fusion in ASD surgery, both of which would improve overall. This is the first study directly comparing surgical outcomes between combined anterior-posterior approaches and all-posterior approach in a matched ASD population.

methodsThis is a retrospective matched control cohort analysis with substitution using a multicenter prospectively collected ASD data of patients with > 2 year FU. Matching criteria include: age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Score, Lumbar Cobb angle, sagittal deformity (Global tilt) and ODI.

resultsIn total, 1024 ASD patients were available for analysis. 29 Combined Approaches patients met inclusion criteria, and only 22 could be matched (1:2 ratio). Preoperative non-matched demographical, clinical, surgical and radiological parameters were comparable between both groups. Combined approaches had longer surgeries (548 mns vs 283) with more blood loss (2850 ml vs 1471) and needed longer ICU stays (74 h vs 27). Despite added morbidity, they had comparable complication rates but with significantly less readmissions (9.1% vs 38.1%) and reoperations (18.2% vs 43.2%) at 2 years. Combined Approaches achieved more individualised and harmonious deformity correction initially. At the 2 years control, Combined Approaches patients reported better outcomes as measured by COMI and SRS scores. This trend was maintained at 3 years.

conclusionDespite an increased initial surgical invasiveness, combined approaches seem to achieve more harmonious correction with superior sagittal deformity control; they need fewer revisions and have improved long-term functional outcomes when compared to all-posterior approaches for ASD deformity correction.

Indexed as

LordosisScoliosisSpinal FusionAdultHumansReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnteriorDeformityResultsScoliosisSpineSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.