Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35621936›Full record

ReviewMarine drugs2022

Emerging Trends in Genetic Engineering of Microalgae for Commercial Applications.

Samir B Grama, Zhiyuan Liu, Jian Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Trends inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Harnessing microalgae for bioproducts: innovations in synthetic biology.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  9. Gene expression analysis reveals genes related to heavy metals and produced water exposure in Synechococcus elongatus.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Valorization ofACS omega · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The need for smart microalgal bioprospecting.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samir B GramaLaboratory of Natural Substances, Biomolecules and Biotechnological Applications, University of Oum El Bouaghi, Oum El Bouaghi 04000, Algeria.ORCID 0000-0002-2233-3741
Zhiyuan LiuCollege of Marine Sciences, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China.
Jian LiCollege of Agricultural Sciences, Panzhihua University, Panzhihua 617000, China.

Funding

Joint Program of Sichuan University and Panzhihua City for Industrial Innovation, China 2019CDPZH-19Science and Technology Planning Program in Sichuan, China 2019YFN0121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, microalgal biotechnology has received increasing interests in producing valuable, sustainable and environmentally friendly bioproducts. The development of economically viable production processes entails resolving certain limitations of microalgal biotechnology, and fast evolving genetic engineering technologies have emerged as new tools to overcome these limitations. This review provides a synopsis of recent progress, current trends and emerging approaches of genetic engineering of microalgae for commercial applications, including production of pharmaceutical protein, lipid, carotenoids and biohydrogen, etc. Photochemistry improvement in microalgae and CO

Indexed as

MicroalgaeBiotechnologyCarotenoidsGenetic EngineeringHumansCarotenoidsbiotechnological productiongenetic engineeringgenetic modificationmicroalgae

Identifiers

PMID35621936
PMCPMC9143385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.