ArticleJournal of imaging2022
upU-Net Approaches for Background Emission Removal in Fluorescence Microscopy.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing the multichannel gap through computational reconstruction of interaction in super-resolution microscopy.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Constrained Plug-and-Play Priors for Image Restoration.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The physical process underlying microscopy imaging suffers from several issues: some of them include the blurring effect due to the Point Spread Function, the presence of Gaussian or Poisson noise, or even a mixture of these two types of perturbation. Among them, auto-fluorescence presents other artifacts in the registered image, and such fluorescence may be an important obstacle in correctly recognizing objects and organisms in the image. For example, particle tracking may suffer from the presence of this kind of perturbation. The objective of this work is to employ Deep Learning techniques, in the form of U-Nets like architectures, for background emission removal. Such fluorescence is modeled by Perlin noise, which reveals to be a suitable candidate for simulating such a phenomenon. The proposed architecture succeeds in removing the fluorescence, and at the same time, it acts as a denoiser for both Gaussian and Poisson noise. The performance of this approach is furthermore assessed on actual microscopy images and by employing the restored images for particle recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.