ArticleJournal of imaging2022
Intraretinal Layer Segmentation Using Cascaded Compressed U-Nets.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Single-Modal to Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Databases, Modalities, Diagnostic Performance, and Clinical Translation Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review on Retinal Biomarkers to Diagnose Dementia from OCT/OCTA Images.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2023Pooled it
- Hybrid deep learning and optimal graph search method for optical coherence tomography layer segmentation in diseases affecting the optic nerve.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Quantifying the spatial patterns of retinal ganglion cell loss and progression in optic neuropathy by applying a deep learning variational autoencoder approach to optical coherence tomography.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2024Article
- TranSegNet: Hybrid CNN-Vision Transformers Encoder for Retina Segmentation of Optical Coherence Tomography.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Acute Optic Neuritis Network (ACON): Study protocol of a non-interventional prospective multicenter study on diagnosis and treatment of acute optic neuritis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Berlin Registry of Neuroimmunological entities (BERLimmun): protocol of a prospective observational study.BMC neurology · 2022Observational
- Prior optic neuritis detection on peripapillary ring scans using deep learning.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022Article
- Frontiers in Retinal Image Processing.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable biomarkers quantifying neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation in central nervous system disorders such as Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer's dementia or Parkinson's disease are an unmet clinical need. Intraretinal layer thicknesses on macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) images are promising noninvasive biomarkers querying neuroretinal structures with near cellular resolution. However, changes are typically subtle, while tissue gradients can be weak, making intraretinal segmentation a challenging task. A robust and efficient method that requires no or minimal manual correction is an unmet need to foster reliable and reproducible research as well as clinical application. Here, we propose and validate a cascaded two-stage network for intraretinal layer segmentation, with both networks being compressed versions of U-Net (CCU-INSEG). The first network is responsible for retinal tissue segmentation from OCT B-scans. The second network segments eight intraretinal layers with high fidelity. At the post-processing stage, we introduce Laplacian-based outlier detection with layer surface hole filling by adaptive non-linear interpolation. Additionally, we propose a weighted version of focal loss to minimize the foreground-background pixel imbalance in the training data. We train our method using 17,458 B-scans from patients with autoimmune optic neuropathies, i.e., multiple sclerosis, and healthy controls. Voxel-wise comparison against manual segmentation produces a mean absolute error of 2.3 μm, outperforming current state-of-the-art methods on the same data set. Voxel-wise comparison against external glaucoma data leads to a mean absolute error of 2.6 μm when using the same gold standard segmentation approach, and 3.7 μm mean absolute error in an externally segmented data set. In scans from patients with severe optic atrophy, 3.5% of B-scan segmentation results were rejected by an experienced grader, whereas this was the case in 41.4% of B-scans segmented with a graph-based reference method. The validation results suggest that the proposed method can robustly segment macular scans from eyes with even severe neuroretinal changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.