Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35621903›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2022

Intraretinal Layer Segmentation Using Cascaded Compressed U-Nets.

Sunil Kumar Yadav, Rahele Kafieh, Hanna Gwendolyn Zimmermann, Josef Kauer-Bonin, Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi, Vahid Mohammadzadeh, Lynn Shi, Ella Maria Kadas, Friedemann Paul, Seyedamirhosein Motamedi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Prior optic neuritis detection on peripapillary ring scans using deep learning.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022
    Article
  9. Frontiers in Retinal Image Processing.Journal of imaging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sunil Kumar YadavExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13125 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9913-8442
Rahele KafiehExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13125 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0087-9476
Hanna Gwendolyn ZimmermannExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Josef Kauer-BoninExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13125 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7207-9027
Kouros Nouri-MahdaviGlaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9403-8904
Vahid MohammadzadehGlaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Lynn ShiGlaucoma Division, Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Ella Maria KadasNocturne GmbH, 10119 Berlin, Germany.
Friedemann PaulExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Seyedamirhosein MotamediExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13125 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6897-5387
Alexander Ulrich BrandtExperimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Max Delbrück Center · DEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Detection of Disease Progression in Advanced GlaucomaR01EY029792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NOURI-MAHDAVI, KOUROS · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
Trigeminal Afferents Regulation of Apical Periodontitis DevelopmentR01DE027929 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI DIOGENES, ANIBAL · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029792NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE027929NIH HHS EY027929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable biomarkers quantifying neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation in central nervous system disorders such as Multiple Sclerosis, Alzheimer's dementia or Parkinson's disease are an unmet clinical need. Intraretinal layer thicknesses on macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) images are promising noninvasive biomarkers querying neuroretinal structures with near cellular resolution. However, changes are typically subtle, while tissue gradients can be weak, making intraretinal segmentation a challenging task. A robust and efficient method that requires no or minimal manual correction is an unmet need to foster reliable and reproducible research as well as clinical application. Here, we propose and validate a cascaded two-stage network for intraretinal layer segmentation, with both networks being compressed versions of U-Net (CCU-INSEG). The first network is responsible for retinal tissue segmentation from OCT B-scans. The second network segments eight intraretinal layers with high fidelity. At the post-processing stage, we introduce Laplacian-based outlier detection with layer surface hole filling by adaptive non-linear interpolation. Additionally, we propose a weighted version of focal loss to minimize the foreground-background pixel imbalance in the training data. We train our method using 17,458 B-scans from patients with autoimmune optic neuropathies, i.e., multiple sclerosis, and healthy controls. Voxel-wise comparison against manual segmentation produces a mean absolute error of 2.3 μm, outperforming current state-of-the-art methods on the same data set. Voxel-wise comparison against external glaucoma data leads to a mean absolute error of 2.6 μm when using the same gold standard segmentation approach, and 3.7 μm mean absolute error in an externally segmented data set. In scans from patients with severe optic atrophy, 3.5% of B-scan segmentation results were rejected by an experienced grader, whereas this was the case in 41.4% of B-scans segmented with a graph-based reference method. The validation results suggest that the proposed method can robustly segment macular scans from eyes with even severe neuroretinal changes.

Indexed as

deep learningintraretinal layer segmentationoptical coherence tomography (OCT)retinaU-Net

Identifiers

PMID35621903
PMCPMC9146486
OpenAlexW4280597276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.