Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35621814›Full record

ArticleInsects2022

Utilization of Pomelo (

Naduvilthara U Visakh, Berin Pathrose, Arunaksharan Narayanankutty, Ahmed Alfarhan, Varsha Ramesh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Chemical composition ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Chemical Composition of theAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. High-efficiency reduction ofRSC advances · 2022
    Article
  18. Botanical Oils Isolated fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Naduvilthara U VisakhDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur 680656, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8322-811X
Berin PathroseDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur 680656, India.
Arunaksharan NarayanankuttyDivision of Cell and Molecular Biology, PG & Research Department of Zoology, St. Joseph's College (Autonomous), Devagiri, Calicut 673008, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6232-1665
Ahmed AlfarhanDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Varsha RameshDepartment of Biotechnology, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
Kerala Agricultural University · INDeakin University · AUKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wastes generated during the post-harvest handling of various agricultural commodities is rather under-utlilized. The peels of citrus fruits are often discarded as waste. Citrus peels are rich in essential oils and exhibit toxicity towards various insect species. The essential oils are also an eco-friendly option for insect pest management. The

Indexed as

Aedes aegyptiArmigeres subalbatusCallosobruchus maculatusCulex tritaeniorhynchusessential oilfumigant toxicityinsecticidal toxicitylarvicidal toxicitylimonenerepellent activityTribolium castaneum

Identifiers

PMID35621814
PMCPMC9146202
OpenAlexW4280636766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.