Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35621670›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Newly Diagnosed Multifocal GBM: A Monocentric Experience and Literature Review.

Valentina Baro, Giulia Cerretti, Michela Todoverto, Alessandro Della Puppa, Franco Chioffi, Francesco Volpin, Francesco Causin, Fabio Busato, Pasquale Fiduccia, Andrea Landi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Dose escalation with simultaneous integrated boost for un-methylated multiple glioblastoma.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina BaroAcademic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Giulia CerrettiDepartment of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Michela TodovertoAcademic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Alessandro Della PuppaNeurosurgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Firenze, Italy.
Franco ChioffiNeurosurgery Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Francesco VolpinNeurosurgery Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Francesco CausinNeuroradiology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6491-7027
Fabio BusatoRadiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Pasquale FiducciaClinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5789-3407
Andrea LandiAcademic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7185-7779
Domenico d'AvellaAcademic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Vittorina ZagonelDepartment of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Luca DenaroAcademic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2529-6149
Giuseppe LombardiDepartment of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1316-2132
University of Padua · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastomas with multiple foci at presentation (mGBMs) account for 2-35% of all GBMs. mGBMs have limited existing data and no standardized treatment. This study aims to determine their incidence, demographic and clinical features, outcome, and prognostic factors in terms of overall survival. We performed a monocentric retrospective study, reviewing patients treated at the Istituto Oncologico Veneto. Inclusion criteria were: new diagnosis of GBM and presence of multiple lesions on pre-treatment MRI. ECOG PS was used to evaluate clinical condition, RANO criteria for radiological assessment, and CTCAE v5.0 for treatment-related adverse events. The incidence of newly diagnosed mGBM was 7.2% and the study population consisted of 98 patients. Median age was 63 years, M:F ratio of 1.8:1, and a surgical approach was undertaken in 73 patients (mostly partial resection). MGMT was methylated in 47.5%, and 82 patients received active oncological treatment (65.9% radiotherapy plus temozolomide (RT + TMZ)). The disease control rate with RT + TMZ was 63%. Median OS of the entire study population was 10.2 months (95% CI 6.6-13.8), and median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.2-5.2). The ECOG PS, the extent of resection, and the RT + TMZ were significant prognostic factors in the univariate analysis for OS, but only the RT + TMZ was a significant independent OS predictor in the multivariate analysis (HR = 3.1, 95% IC 1.3-7.7,

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDacarbazineAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTemozolomideAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineTemozolomideglioblastomamulticentricmultifocaloncologysurgerysurvival

Identifiers

PMID35621670
PMCPMC9139839
OpenAlexW4280616776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.