Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35621669›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Megaprosthesis for Metastatic Bone Disease-A Comparative Analysis.

Joachim Thorkildsen, Thale Asp Strøm, Nils Jørgen Strøm, Simen Sellevold, Ole-Jacob Norum

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07337018 (Valutazione Resezioni Oncologiche e Ricostruzione Con Utilizzo di Impianti Protesici in Chirurgia Oncologica Ortopedica), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07337018 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Valutazione Resezioni Oncologiche e Ricostruzione Con Utilizzo di Impianti Protesici in Chirurgia Oncologica Ortopedica (Evaluation of Oncologic Resections and Reconstruction Using Prosthetic Implants in Orthopedic Oncologic Surgery)

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSRan2026 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsBone Tumor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk of complications and implant survival of surgical treatment of proximal femoral metastasis: a meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Treatment of Bone Metastasis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joachim ThorkildsenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6967-2396
Thale Asp StrømDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Nils Jørgen StrømFaculty of Law, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway.
Simen SellevoldDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Ole-Jacob NorumDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMegaprosthetic reconstruction is sometimes indicated in advanced metastatic bone disease (MBD) of the appendicular skeleton with large degrees of bone loss or need for oncological segmental resection. Outcome after megaprosthetic reconstruction was studied in the setting of primary bone sarcoma with high levels of complications, but it is not known if this applies to MBD.

methodWe performed a comparative analysis of complications and revision surgery for MBD and bone sarcoma surgery in an institutional cohort from 2005-2019. Presented are the descriptive data of the cohort, with Kaplan-Meier (K-M) rates of revision at 1, 2 and 5 years together with a competing risk analysis by indication type.

resultsRates of revision surgery are significantly lower for MBD (8% at 1 year, 12% at 2 years), in the intermediate term, compared to that of sarcoma (18% at 1 year, 24% at 2 years) (

conclusionRates of revision surgery after megaprosthetic reconstruction of MBD are significantly lower than that for primary bone sarcoma in this cohort.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateReoperationRetrospective Studiescomplicationsmegaprosthesismetastatic bone diseaserevisionsarcomasurgery

Identifiers

PMID35621669
PMCPMC9139992
OpenAlexW4229447036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.