Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35621656›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Identification of CT Values That Could Be Predictive of Necrosis (N-CTav) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Lenvatinib Treatment.

Makoto Chuma, Hideki Yokoo, Atsushi Hiraoka, Kazuhiko Ueda, Takahiro Yokoyama, Kunihiko Tsuji, Noritomo Shimada, Haruki Uojima, Satoshi Kobayashi, Nobuhiro Hattori and 21 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 19 institutions in 1 country.

Makoto ChumaGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan.
Hideki YokooDepartment of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplant Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa 078-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6203-8528
Atsushi HiraokaGastroenterological Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Kazuhiko UedaDiagnostic Imaging Center, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Takahiro YokoyamaGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan.
Kunihiko TsujiCenter of Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo 006-8555, Japan.
Noritomo ShimadaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Otakanomori Hospital, Kashiwa 277-0863, Japan.
Haruki UojimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara 252-0375, Japan.
Satoshi KobayashiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital, Yokohama 241-8585, Japan.
Nobuhiro HattoriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 216-8511, Japan.
Tomomi OkuboDivision of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Inzai 270-1694, Japan.
Masanori AtsukawaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3374-7111
Toru IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Niigata Hospital, Niigata 950-1104, Japan.
Koichi TakaguchiDepartment of Hepatology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu 760-8557, Japan.
Akemi TsutsuiDepartment of Hepatology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu 760-8557, Japan.
Hidenori ToyodaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki 503-8502, Japan.
Toshifumi TadaDepartment of Internal medicine, Japanese Red Cross Himeji Hospital, Himeji 670-8540, Japan.
Yoshinori SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asahikawa-Kosei General Hospital, Asahikawa 078-8211, Japan.
Shunji HiroseDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara 259-1193, Japan.
Takaaki TanakaGastroenterological Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama 790-0024, Japan.
Kazuhisa TakedaGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan.
Masako OtaniDiagnostic Pathology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan.
Zenjiro SekikawaDiagnostic Radiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan.
Tsunamasa WatanabeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 216-8511, Japan.
Hisashi HidakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara 252-0375, Japan.
Manabu MorimotoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital, Yokohama 241-8585, Japan.
Kazushi NumataGastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama 232-0024, Japan.
Tatehiro KagawaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara 259-1193, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3442-1423
Michiie SakamotoDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Takashi KumadaCenter of Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo 006-8555, Japan.
Shin MaedaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.
Yokohama City University Medical Center · JPEhime Prefectural Central Hospital · JPKagawa Prefectural Central Hospital · JPKanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization · JPKitasato University · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPTeine Keijinkai Hospital · JPTokai University · JPAsahikawa Kosei Hospital · JPAsahikawa Medical University · JPChiba Hokusou Hospital · JPHimeji Red Cross Hospital · JPKeio University · JPNippon Medical School · JPOgaki Municipal Hospital · JPOtemae Hospital · JPSaiseikai Niigata Daini Hospital · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPYokohama City University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the utility of measurement of the computed tomography (CT) attenuation value (CTav) in predicting tumor necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who achieve a complete response (CR), defined using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), after lenvatinib treatment. Method: We compared CTav in arterial phase CT images with postoperative histopathology in four patients who underwent HCC resection after lenvatinib treatment, to determine CTav thresholds indicative of histological necrosis (N-CTav). Next, we confirmed the accuracy of the determined N-CTav in 15 cases with histopathologically proven necrosis in surgical specimens. Furthermore, the percentage of the tumor with N-CTav, i.e., the N-CTav occupancy rate, assessed using Image J software in 30 tumors in 12 patients with CR out of 571 HCC patients treated with lenvatinib, and its correlation with local recurrence following CR were examined. Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed an optimal cut-off value of CTav of 30.2 HU, with 90.0% specificity and 65.0% sensitivity in discriminating between pathologically identified necrosis and degeneration, with a CTav of less than 30.2 HU indicating necrosis after lenvatinib treatment (N30-CTav). Furthermore, the optimal cut-off value of 30.6% for the N30-CTav occupancy rate by ROC analysis was a significant indicator of local recurrence following CR with 76.9% specificity and sensitivity (area under the ROC curve; 0.939), with the CR group with high N30-CTav occupancy (≥30.6%) after lenvatinib treatment showing significantly lower local recurrence (8.3% at 1 year) compared with the low (<30.6%) N30-CTav group (p < 0.001, 61.5% at 1 year). Conclusion: The cut-off value of 30.2 HU for CTav (N30-CTav) might be appropriate for identifying post-lenvatinib necrosis in HCC, and an N30-CTav occupancy rate of >30.6% might be a predictor of maintenance of CR. Use of these indicators have the potential to impact systemic chemotherapy for HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsHumansNecrosisPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesTomography, X-Ray ComputedlenvatinibPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinescomplete responseCT valuehepatocellular carcinomalenvatinibmolecular targeted agents

Identifiers

PMID35621656
PMCPMC9139739
OpenAlexW4225378061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.