Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35621655›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Method for the Intraoperative Detection of IDH Mutation in Gliomas with Differential Mobility Spectrometry.

Ilkka Haapala, Anton Kondratev, Antti Roine, Meri Mäkelä, Anton Kontunen, Markus Karjalainen, Aki Laakso, Päivi Koroknay-Pál, Kristiina Nordfors, Hannu Haapasalo and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07781215 (Stool Profile in Evaluating Colitis Treatment Response, Outcome and Severity), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07781215 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Stool Profile in Evaluating Colitis Treatment Response, Outcome and Severity

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorTampere University HospitalRan2026 to 2036Enrolled120ConditionsIBD (Inflammatory Bowel Disease)ArmsDifferential Mobile Spectrometry analysis of the stool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ilkka HaapalaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, 33520 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0383-7319
Anton KondratevFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7021-7868
Antti RoineFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.
Meri MäkeläFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.
Anton KontunenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2220-1351
Markus KarjalainenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.
Aki LaaksoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, 00260 Helsinki, Finland.
Päivi Koroknay-PálDepartment of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, 00260 Helsinki, Finland.
Kristiina NordforsFaculty of Pediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Hannu HaapasaloFimlab Laboratories Ltd., 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Niku OksalaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.
Antti VehkaojaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3721-3467
Joonas HaapasaloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, 33520 Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FITampere University Hospital · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIFimlab (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status is an important factor for surgical decision-making: patients with IDH-mutated tumors are more likely to have a good long-term prognosis, and thus favor aggressive resection with more survival benefit to gain. Patients with IDH wild-type tumors have generally poorer prognosis and, therefore, conservative resection to avoid neurological deficit is favored. Current histopathological analysis with frozen sections is unable to identify IDH mutation status intraoperatively, and more advanced methods are therefore needed. We examined a novel method suitable for intraoperative IDH mutation identification that is based on the differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) analysis of the tumor. We prospectively obtained tumor samples from 22 patients, including 11 IDH-mutated and 11 IDH wild-type tumors. The tumors were cut in 88 smaller specimens that were analyzed with DMS. With a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) algorithm, the DMS was able to classify tumor samples with 86% classification accuracy, 86% sensitivity, and 85% specificity. Our results show that DMS is able to differentiate IDH-mutated and IDH wild-type tumors with good accuracy in a setting suitable for intraoperative use, which makes it a promising novel solution for neurosurgical practice.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationSpectrum AnalysisIsocitrate Dehydrogenaseclassificationdifferential mobility spectrometrygliomaisocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)neuro-oncologyneurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID35621655
PMCPMC9139325
OpenAlexW4225379293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.