ArticleDentistry journal2022
A Scoping Review about the Characteristics and Success-Failure Rates of Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics.
Article in Dentistry journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidisciplinary Orthodontic Management of Non-syndromic Delayed Tooth Eruption and Impacted Maxillary Canine Complicated by Traumatic Mandibular Fracture in a Healthy Adolescent: A Case Report.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Clinical Performance of Infrazygomatic Crest Miniscrews Placed Without Surgical Guides: A Retrospective Study with 30-Month Follow-Up.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Success Rate of Immediately Loaded Orthodontic Temporary Anchorage Devices: A Retrospective Analysis of Patient- and Treatment-Related Factors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Survey of Norwegian orthodontists on the use of temporary anchorage devices.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- RAMPA Therapy: Effects on Craniofacial Growth Assessed by Coben Analysis and Statistical Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Change of Molar Position During Alignment and Leveling With PASS and MBT: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Mandibular third molar protraction using a segmented arch and mini-implant anchorage: A case report.Medicine · 2025Article
- Relationship Between Facial Types and Alveolar Crest Cortical Bone Thickness and CT Values Determined by Multidetector Computed Tomography.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Assessment of Safe Zones for Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement in the Lateral Maxilla: A Retrospective Morphometric Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Orthodontic Management in Pediatric Patients with Rare Diseases: Case Reports.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Occlusal Plane, Mandibular Position and Dentoalveolar Changes during the Orthodontic Treatment with the Use of Mini-Screws.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Surface Analysis of Orthodontic Mini-Implants after Their Clinical Use.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Temporary Anchorage Devices in Combined Treatments: Bridging Orthodontics and Prosthetics : Temporary Anchorage Devices in Combined Treatments.Galen medical journal · 2024Review
- Evaluation of safe areas for miniscrew use according to various skeletal anomalies with CBCT.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- A comparison of maxillary sinus diameters in Chinese and Yemeni patients with skeletal malocclusion.BMC oral health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study synthesized the scientific evidence concerning the main characteristics of the Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) used in orthodontics and reported the success-failure rates during treatment. For that means, this scoping review collected articles from previous research. A complementary search was carried out in the databases PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, LILACS, and EMBASE, focusing on original studies published from 2010 to 2020. We analyzed the main characteristics of the publications. As a result, 103 articles were included. Most of the research was conducted among different groups, who needed TADs principally in the maxilla and an interradicular location between the second premolar and first molar. AbsoAnchor, Dentos Inc., Daegu, Korea, was the most used brand of TADs. The most common characteristics of the devices and biomechanics were a diameter and length of 1.6 mm and 8 mm, a self-drilled system, a closed technique for placement, immediate loading, and forces that ranged between 40 and 800 g. Of the studies, 47.6% showed success rates ≥90%. In conclusion, high success rates were found for TADs, and differences were found according to sociodemographic and clinical variables. The studies showed variability in methodological design, and scientific publications were concentrated in certain countries. We recommend further scientific research on TADs using more standardized designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.