Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35621468›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Applications of Ultrasound-Mediated Gene Delivery in Regenerative Medicine.

Zoe Krut, Dan Gazit, Zulma Gazit, Gadi Pelled

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Epigenetic regulation of transgenes.Journal of biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Zoe KrutDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Dan GazitDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0554-0028
Zulma GazitDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9176-0889
Gadi PelledDepartment of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3857-5531
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Ultrasound-guided DNA delivery for regenerative medicineR01EB026094 · NIBIB · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI GAZIT, DAN · 2018 to 2021
$2.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026094NIH/NIBIB R01EB026094United States Department of Defense W81XWH-18-1-0593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on the capability of non-viral gene delivery systems to induce tissue regeneration is a continued effort as the current use of viral vectors can present with significant limitations. Despite initially showing lower gene transfection and gene expression efficiencies, non-viral delivery methods continue to be optimized to match that of their viral counterparts. Ultrasound-mediated gene transfer, referred to as sonoporation, occurs by the induction of transient membrane permeabilization and has been found to significantly increase the uptake and expression of DNA in cells across many organ systems. In addition, it offers a more favorable safety profile compared to other non-viral delivery methods. Studies have shown that microbubble-enhanced sonoporation can elicit significant tissue regeneration in both ectopic and disease models, including bone and vascular tissue regeneration. Despite this, no clinical trials on the use of sonoporation for tissue regeneration have been conducted, although current clinical trials using sonoporation for other indications suggest that the method is safe for use in the clinical setting. In this review, we describe the pre-clinical studies conducted thus far on the use of sonoporation for tissue regeneration. Further, the various techniques used to increase the effectiveness and duration of sonoporation-induced gene transfer, as well as the obstacles that may be currently hindering clinical translation, are explored.

Indexed as

gene therapymicrobubblesregenerative medicinesonoporationtissue regenerationultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD)

Identifiers

PMID35621468
PMCPMC9137703
OpenAlexW4282926456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.