Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35621425›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Differentiating Individuals with and without Alcohol Use Disorder Using Resting-State fMRI Functional Connectivity of Reward Network, Neuropsychological Performance, and Impulsivity Measures.

Chella Kamarajan, Babak A Ardekani, Ashwini K Pandey, Sivan Kinreich, Gayathri Pandey, David B Chorlian, Jacquelyn L Meyers, Jian Zhang, Elaine Bermudez, Weipeng Kuang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chella KamarajanHenri Begleiter Neurodynamics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2291-6880
Babak A ArdekaniCenter for Advanced Brain Imaging, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA.
Ashwini K PandeyHenri Begleiter Neurodynamics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2688-7901
Sivan KinreichHenri Begleiter Neurodynamics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
Gayathri PandeyHenri Begleiter Neurodynamics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
David B ChorlianHenri Begleiter Neurodynamics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
Jacquelyn L MeyersHenri Begleiter Neurodynamics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
Jian ZhangHenri Begleiter Neurodynamics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
Elaine BermudezDepartment of Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Weipeng KuangHenri Begleiter Neurodynamics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
Arthur T StimusHenri Begleiter Neurodynamics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
Bernice PorjeszHenri Begleiter Neurodynamics Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USNathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research · USNew York University · US

Funding

BRAIN DYSFUNCTION AND ALCOHOLISMR01AA002686 · NIAAA · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI PORJESZ, BERNICE · 1985 to 2018
$9.6M
Brain Function and Neurogenomic influences on AUD risk and resilience.R01AA028848 · NIAAA · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI KAMARAJAN, CHELLA, MEYERS, JACQUELYN LEIGH · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA002686NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA028848NIH HHS R01-AA002686 and R01-AA028848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) may manifest an array of neural and behavioral abnormalities, including altered brain networks, impaired neurocognitive functioning, and heightened impulsivity. Using multidomain measures, the current study aimed to identify specific features that can differentiate individuals with AUD from healthy controls (CTL), utilizing a random forests (RF) classification model. Features included fMRI-based resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) across the reward network, neuropsychological task performance, and behavioral impulsivity scores, collected from thirty abstinent adult males with prior history of AUD and thirty CTL individuals without a history of AUD. It was found that the RF model achieved a classification accuracy of 86.67% (AUC = 93%) and identified key features of FC and impulsivity that significantly contributed to classifying AUD from CTL individuals. Impulsivity scores were the topmost predictors, followed by twelve rsFC features involving seventeen key reward regions in the brain, such as the ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and other cortical and subcortical structures. Individuals with AUD manifested significant differences in impulsivity and alterations in functional connectivity relative to controls. Specifically, AUD showed heightened impulsivity and hypoconnectivity in nine connections across 13 regions and hyperconnectivity in three connections involving six regions. Relative to controls, visuo-spatial short-term working memory was also found to be impaired in AUD. In conclusion, specific multidomain features of brain connectivity, impulsivity, and neuropsychological performance can be used in a machine learning framework to effectively classify AUD individuals from healthy controls.

Indexed as

alcohol use disorder (AUD)functional MRI (fMRI)impulsivityneuropsychological testsrandom forests (RF)resting-state functional connectivity (FC)reward network (RN)

Identifiers

PMID35621425
PMCPMC9137599
OpenAlexW4282946526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.