Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35620922›Full record

ReviewPediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism2022

Pituitary stalk thickening in patients under 18 years of age - the most common causes and diagnostic procedures.

Elżbieta Moszczyńska, Marta Baszyńska-Wilk, Klaudia Zasada, Dorota Majak, Marta Szaniawska, Mieczysław Szalecki

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elżbieta MoszczyńskaDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetology, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Marta Baszyńska-WilkDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetology, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Klaudia ZasadaDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetology, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Dorota MajakDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Marta SzaniawskaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Mieczysław SzaleckiDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetology, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Children's Memorial Health Institute · PLJan Kochanowski University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPituitary stalk thickening (PST) is a rare abnormality in children, and it may be challenging due to its diverse clinical picture. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study is to summarize the data on the causes and diagnostic procedures of PST. MATERIAL AND

methodsPapers were searched in the PubMed database identifying published randomized clinical trials, reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and case reports.

resultsThe most common causes of a thickened pituitary stalk in children are germ cell tumours (GCTs), Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), and lymphocytic infundibulo-neurohypophysitis (LINH). Neurosarcoidosis, pituitary tuberculosis, granulomatosis, or specific inflammations were only reported in the paediatric population as case studies. PST mainly affects teenagers and is often detected with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with central diabetes insipidus (CDI). It is not possible to differentiate the causes of PST with the use of the MRI image alone. Although various biochemical and oncological markers and other imaging tests are used, the diagnosis of PST remains a significant diagnostic challenge for clinicians. The final diagnosis is made based on histopathological examination. The indications for a biopsy are not uniform. Most experts, including the authors of the 2021 British consensus, recommend biopsy in the case of PST with a stalk lesion diameter ≥ 6.5-7 mm.

conclusionsThe differential diagnosis of PST is a challenge. The diagnostic and treatment strategy should be individually adapted. Patients should be diagnosed in large clinical centres with experience in this field.

Indexed as

Diabetes Insipidus, NeurogenicHistiocytosis, Langerhans-CellPituitary DiseasesAdolescentChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPituitary Glandchildrendiabetes insipidusgerminomahistiocytosispituitary stalk thickening

Identifiers

PMID35620922
PMCPMC10214961
OpenAlexW4282921563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.