Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35620814›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2022

Using a home time measure to differentiate ACO performance for seriously ill populations.

Salama S Freed, Brystana G Kaufman, Courtney H Van Houtven, Robert Saunders

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Healthcare contact days among older adults living with dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Is every day at home a good day?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Salama S FreedMargolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7158-0792
Brystana G KaufmanMargolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6553-0406
Courtney H Van HoutvenMargolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0783-1611
Robert SaundersMargolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

West Health Policy Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlternative Payment Models (APMs) piloted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) such as ACO Realizing Equity, Access and Community Health (REACH) seek to improve care and quality of life among seriously ill populations (SIP). Days at Home (DAH) was proposed for use in this model to evaluate organizational performance. It is important to assess the utility and feasibility of person-centered outcomes measures, such as DAH, as CMS seeks to advance care models for seriously ill beneficiaries. We leverage existing Accountable Care Organization (ACO) contracts to evaluate the feasibility of ACO-level DAH measure and examine characteristics associated with ACOs with more DAH.

methodsWe calculated DAH for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 68 and over who were retrospectively attributed to a Medicare ACO between 2014 and 2018 and met the seriously ill criteria. We then aggregated to the ACO level DAH for each ACO's seriously ill beneficiaries and risk-adjusted this aggregated measure. Finally, we evaluated associations between risk-adjusted DAH per person-year and ACO, beneficiary, and market characteristics.

resultsACOs' seriously ill beneficiaries spent an average of 349.3 risk-adjusted DAH per person-year. Risk-adjusted ACO variation, defined as the interquartile range, was 4.21 days (IQR = 347.32-351.53). Beneficiaries of ACOs are composed of a less racially diverse beneficiary cohort, opting for two-sided risk models, and operating in markets with fewer hospital and Skilled Nursing Facility beds had more DAH.

conclusionsSubstantial variation across ACOs in the DAH measure for seriously ill beneficiaries suggests the measure can differentiate between high and low performing provider groups. Key to the success of the metric is accurate risk adjustment to ensure providers have adequate resources to care for seriously ill beneficiaries. Organizational factors, such as the ACO size and level of risk, are strongly associated with more days at home.

Indexed as

Accountable Care OrganizationsAgedFee-for-Service PlansHumansMedicareQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesUnited Statesaccountable care organizationsmodels of carequality measurementseriously ill

Identifiers

PMID35620814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.