Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35620730›Full record

ArticleContraception: X2022

Prevalence and characteristics of covert contraceptive use in the Performance Monitoring for Action multi-country study.

Dana O Sarnak, Elizabeth Gummerson, Shannon N Wood, Funmilola M OlaOlorun, Simon Peter Sebina Kibira, Linnea A Zimmerman, Philip Anglewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Relationship Dynamics and Young Women's Contraceptive Use.Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2024
    Article
  3. Fertility Desires and Contraceptive Transition.Population and development review · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dana O SarnakDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Elizabeth GummersonDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Shannon N WoodDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Funmilola M OlaOlorunDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
Simon Peter Sebina KibiraDepartment of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Linnea A ZimmermanDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Philip AnglewiczDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-009639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: A more nuanced understanding of contributors to covert contraceptive use remains critical to protecting covert users and reducing its necessity. This study aimed to examine the overall prevalence of covert use, and sociodemographic characteristics associated with covert vs overt use across multiple geographies in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Study Design: Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) is one of the few nationally representative surveys that measures covert use across socially diverse contexts via a direct question. Utilizing PMA 2019-2020 phase 1 data from Burkina Faso, Côte D'Ivoire, Kenya, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC; Kinshasa and Kongo Central regions), Uganda, Nigeria (Kano and Lagos), Niger, and Rajasthan, we estimated overall prevalence of covert use. We conducted bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regressions for 6 sites, comparing the odds of covert use with overt use among users of contraception by sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Covert use ranged from 1% in Rajasthan to 16% in Burkina Faso. Marital status was the only sociodemographic characteristic consistently associated with type of use across sites. Specifically, polygynous marriage (compared to monogamous) increased odds of using covertly, ranging from adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.7] in Burkina Faso to 6.2 [95% CI 2.9-13.3] in Kinshasa. Unmarried women with partners or boyfriends were also more likely to be using covertly compared with their monogamously married counterparts in all sites (aORs ranged from 2.2 [95% CI 1.0-4.7] in Uganda to 4.4 [95% CI 1.7-11.0] in Kinshasa). Conclusion: Understanding factors associated with covert use has programmatic and policy implications for women's reproductive autonomy. Implications: Covert use is a common phenomenon across most sites, representing a small but programmatically important contingent of users. Family planning providers and programs must protect access to and maintain privacy of reproductive services to this population, but should also focus on creating interventions and environments that support overt use.

Indexed as

Covert contraceptive useFamily planningPartner dynamicssub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID35620730
PMCPMC9127266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.