ArticleRegenerative therapy2022
A comparative analysis of attitudes toward stem cell research and regenerative medicine between six countries - A pilot study.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expectations regarding regenerative medicine and attitudes toward invasive surgical therapies in patients with Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional survey.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of media coverage concerning the social implications on three life sciences in Japan during 1991-2020.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of regulations and studies on stem cell therapies: focusing on induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based treatments.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Article
- Attitudes of patients with IVF/ICSI toward human embryo in vitro culture beyond 14 days.Regenerative therapy · 2024Article
- Public attitudes toward the use of human induced pluripotent stem cells: insights from an Italian adult population.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Opportunities and challenges to implementing mRNA-based vaccines and medicines: lessons from COVID-19.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- A comparative analysis of attitudes toward genome-edited food among Japanese public and scientific community.PloS one · 2024Article
- Attitudes towards human fetal tissue research: Survey of researchers and the public in Japan.Regenerative therapy · 2023Article
- Survey of Japanese researchers and the public regarding the culture of human embryos in vitro beyond 14 days.Stem cell reports · 2023Article
- Cross-contamination risk and decontamination during changeover after cell-product processing.Regenerative therapy · 2023Article
- Stress and motivation of cell processing operators: A pilot study of an online questionnaire survey.Regenerative therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breakthroughs in stem cell research (SCR) and regenerative medicine (RM) have attracted significant public attention worldwide. Simultaneously, scientific communities and science policies have tried to establish appropriate governance of SCR and RM. In this context, effective communication between scientific communities and the public is regarded as a key factor. However, the diversity of public attitudes and interests has not been sufficiently examined, especially the differences across countries. Methods: We conducted an international comparison of public attitudes toward SCR and RM. We circulated an internet questionnaire among people in six countries: Japan, South Korea, the United States, the UK, Germany, and France. We collected 100 valid responses from each country, and a total of 600 responses were obtained. Results: Our key findings are the diversity of interests in RM, which can be expressed as user pragmatism, governance and handling of RM, risk, and benefit, and scientific interests. The priority of interests varied across the six countries, and the variations may be influenced by the political, social, cultural, and media contexts of SCR and RM in each country. Conclusion: The implications can contribute to a deeper understanding of the diversity of public attitudes, and bring about an appropriate examination of a wide range of ethical and social concerns of SCR and RM in global contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.