Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35620621›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

General health literacy scale for Thais and comparison between age groups.

Ungsinun Intarakamhang, Julaporn Khammungkul, Piya Boocha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Causal Model of Herb Use Behavior Among Working-age Adults in Thailand.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ungsinun IntarakamhangBehavioral Science Research Institute, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Julaporn KhammungkulSrinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piya BoochaInnovative Learning Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Srinakharinwirot University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health literacy (HL) has captured the world's interest since it was first defined by WHO in 1998. In Thailand, a number of HL scales for risk groups have been developed but none for the general population. Therefore, this research aimed to develop a general health literacy (GHL) scale for Thais and compare HL levels between groups, i.e. students, youth, adults, and older. Methods: In this mixed-methods study, a focus group was conducted with 20 health policy-makers. Data were collected from 4,000 participants from all regions of Thailand through questionnaires between 2018 and 2019. The participants were divided into 4 age groups: aged 7-14, 15-24, 25-59, and 60-75. All of them were selected using stratified random sampling. Data analysis was performed using CFA and ANOVA. Results: 1) The GHL Scale for Thais comprised 47 items, covering 5 domains i.e. access to health information and services, understanding of health information and service leading to practice, health information and service appraisal, communication and social support, and health self-management. The scale had high Cronbach's alpha values for all participants and different age groups (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95-0.97) and factor loadings ranging from 0.45 to 0.77. 2) Most Thai people (58.9%) had a fair level of HL, followed by high HL (24.3%) and low HL (16.8%). 3) The comparison of HL among age groups had different mean scores (P < .05) and low HL was found in adults (25.00%), older (18.60%), youth (12.60%), and students (11.40%), respectively. Conclusion: The GHL Scale for Thais can be used to screen people of all ages for potential health problems and develop strategies for promoting health resilience and preventing disease in each age group.

Indexed as

General health literacy scaleHealth literacyMeasurement

Identifiers

PMID35620621
PMCPMC9127311
OpenAlexW4280591298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.