Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35620540›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2022

Risk factors for spontaneous preterm birth among healthy nulliparous pregnant women in the Netherlands, a prospective cohort study.

Heleen J Schuster, Myrthe J C S Peelen, Petra J Hajenius, Monique D M van Beukering, Rik van Eekelen, Marit Schonewille, Henna Playfair, Joris A M van der Post, Marjolein Kok, Rebecca C Painter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Urinary tract infections and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Heleen J SchusterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2230-0261
Myrthe J C S PeelenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1281-0911
Petra J HajeniusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1092-4322
Monique D M van BeukeringDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Rik van EekelenAmsterdam Reproduction and Development Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9045-3630
Marit SchonewilleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Henna PlayfairAmsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Joris A M van der PostDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3311-2116
Marjolein KokDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9420-2313
Rebecca C PainterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9336-6033
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLGemeente Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) is a major contributor to neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. The pathophysiology of sPTB is poorly understood, in particular among nulliparous women without apparent medical or obstetric risk factors. Therefore, we aimed to identify risk factors for sPTB in healthy nulliparous women. Material and Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study. Recruitment took place from February 2014 to December 2016 in 16 community midwifery centers in the Netherlands. Eligibility criteria were: ≥18 years, no previous pregnancy >16 weeks of gestation, healthy singleton pregnancy, and antenatal booking <24 weeks of gestation. At study inclusion, participants completed a questionnaire, including details on lifestyle, work, and medical history. Cervical length was measured by vaginal ultrasound at the second-trimester anomaly scan. Detailed information concerning pregnancy and birth was collected via antenatal charts. We calculated the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for various risk factors with correction for socioeconomic status (SES) using logistic regression and Firth's correction. Results: We included 363 women of whom pregnancy outcomes were available in 349 (96.1%) participants. The cervical length measurement was available for 225 (62.0%) participants. sPTB occurred in 26 women (7.5%). SES was associated with sPTB (OR: 3.7, 95%  CI: 1.6-8.5) in univariate analysis. First or second trimester vaginal bleeding (aOR: 3.6, 95% CI: 1.4-9.0) and urinary tract infection during pregnancy (aOR: 4.9, 95% CI: 1.7-13.9) were associated with sPTB in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: This prospective cohort confirms established risk factors for sPTB in nulliparous women deemed at low risk of sPTB.

Indexed as

bio‐samplescohort profilenulliparous womenrisk factorsspontaneous preterm birth

Identifiers

PMID35620540
PMCPMC9127744
OpenAlexW4281563158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.