Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35620527›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

Orthopaedic Residency Applicants' Perspective on Program-Based Social Media.

Joseph C Brinkman, David G Deckey, Sailesh V Tummala, Jeffrey D Hassebrock, Mark J Spangehl, Joshua S Bingham

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Social Media and Wellness: Evolving Trends in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Representation.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of Vascular Neurology Fellowship Websites in the U.S.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph C BrinkmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-8923
David G DeckeyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7374-5001
Sailesh V TummalaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8907-3542
Jeffrey D HassebrockDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3384-8724
Mark J SpangehlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1090-9165
Joshua S BinghamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1540-852X
Mayo Clinic Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media and online resources have been used in graduate medical education for years. In addition to an official residency program website, many orthopaedic surgery programs have an established social media presence to interact, educate, and engage with prospective applicants. The role of social media in orthopaedic surgery has significantly expanded in recent years. Despite its increasing use, the specific impact of social media on orthopaedic surgery residency applicants remains unknown. Methods: Applicants to the home institution's orthopaedic surgery residency program were sent an optional online survey during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle. No incentive was provided in exchange for participation. Results: Of 812 orthopaedic surgery applicants, 650 (80%) completed the survey. Program-based social media is widely accessed by applicants. Instagram is used by most applicants (61.9%), and nearly a third (28.7%) rely on it as their main resource when researching prospective residency programs. The majority (66.9%) agreed that social media can be successfully used to inform and interact with applicants. Most of the applicants (60.6%) also reported that social media had a positive impact on their perception of the associated program. Only 5.7% of respondents indicated that social media had a negative influence. The most effective uses of social media seem to be in allowing a program to display its culture and transparency. Conclusion: Social media plays a substantial role in the orthopaedic surgery residency application process, and its use continues to grow. Programs can use it to effectively engage with and inform prospective applicants. The impact of social media is positive on most of the applicants. Instagram is the preferred social media platform used by applicants, and nearly one-third rely on it as their main resource when researching programs. Investing time and resources into a social media presence seems to be a worthwhile pursuit for orthopaedic surgery programs as an important piece to a well-rounded recruitment effort of modern orthopaedic surgery applicants.

Identifiers

PMID35620527
PMCPMC9116946
OpenAlexW4282922123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.