ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Facial Anthropometry and Analysis in Egyptian Women.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-Dimensional Simulation Accuracy and Patient Satisfaction With Rhinoplasty.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
- The Correlation Between Maxillary Central Incisor Dimensions and Different Points on the Face in a Syrian Population.BioMed research international · 2024Article
- Acquisition of Precision and Reliability of Modalities for Facial Reconstruction and Aesthetic Surgery: A Systematic Review.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2023Article
- Consensus Statement on the Use of Botulinum Neurotoxin in the Middle East.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human facial analysis can be considered both an art and a science, and is used extensively to measure soft tissue proportions. Remarkable changes exist in anthropometric measures due to changes over centuries of geographical, genetic, and environmental factors, as well as waves of migration causing facial proportions to vary among the different ethnic groups. The purpose of this study was to establish facial soft tissue norms for the Egyptian female population between the ages of 18 and 50, as well as several age-related changes in facial measurements that are described fairly scarcely in the literature. Methods: A prospective study was carried out on 300 Egyptian women between June 2019 and December 2020. All were volunteers and between 18 and 50 years old. Facial measurements were obtained by both direct (caliper-based) and indirect (3D Crisalix software) anthropometric analysis. Anthropometric measurements used in the study included seventeen facial measurements derived from different anthropometric soft tissue landmarks from each subject and eight measurements for analysis. Results: Our results were able to describe the average facial and nasal measurements of the Egyptian female population, as well as the horizontal and vertical analysis of facial proportions. We also determined similarities with other Middle Eastern female measurements, with subtle differences in facial width and nasal height and width compared with Turkish and Iranian women. Conclusions: The current study is valuable because it delivers facial anthropometric measures for Egyptian female faces. This can provide a database for a multitude of uses, including operative planning, postoperative measurements, and forensic and ergonomic purposes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.