Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35620473›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

A New Nano Adjuvant of PF3 Used for an Enhanced Hepatitis B Vaccine.

Pu Shan, Zhibiao Wang, Jilai Li, Duoqian Wei, Zhuan Zhang, Shaojie Hao, Yibo Hou, Yunyang Wang, Shuxiang Li, Xudong Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Research progress of mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases.European journal of medical research · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pu ShanNational Vaccine and Serum Institute (NVSI), China National Biotech Group (CNBG), Beijing, China.
Zhibiao WangNational Vaccine and Serum Institute (NVSI), China National Biotech Group (CNBG), Beijing, China.
Jilai LiNational Vaccine and Serum Institute (NVSI), China National Biotech Group (CNBG), Beijing, China.
Duoqian WeiNational Vaccine and Serum Institute (NVSI), China National Biotech Group (CNBG), Beijing, China.
Zhuan ZhangNational Vaccine and Serum Institute (NVSI), China National Biotech Group (CNBG), Beijing, China.
Shaojie HaoNational Vaccine and Serum Institute (NVSI), China National Biotech Group (CNBG), Beijing, China.
Yibo HouNational Vaccine and Serum Institute (NVSI), China National Biotech Group (CNBG), Beijing, China.
Yunyang WangBeijing Institute of Biological Products Co., Beijing, China.
Shuxiang LiNational Vaccine and Serum Institute (NVSI), China National Biotech Group (CNBG), Beijing, China.
Xudong WangNational Vaccine and Serum Institute (NVSI), China National Biotech Group (CNBG), Beijing, China.
Jing XuNational Vaccine and Serum Institute (NVSI), China National Biotech Group (CNBG), Beijing, China.
National Vaccine and Serum Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant protein vaccines, with highly pure ingredients and good safety, are gradually replacing some attenuated and inactivated vaccines in clinical practice. However, since their low immunogenicity of the recombinant proteins, adjuvants are often needed to enhance immune response after vaccination. Aluminum adjuvant has been widely used in some vaccines for decades, it can induce strong humoral immunity, but the deficiency of cellular immunity limits its application for some vaccines. Therefore, it is urgently needed to develop novel adjuvant to increase not only humoral but also cellular immune response. To address this, we designed and prepared a new nano adjuvant (PF3) through microfluidization by the combination of saponin (Ginsenoside Rg1) and oil-in-water nano emulsion (NE) in the present study. As compared to aluminum adjuvant, PF3 had stronger humoral and cellular immune induction effect because of high cellular uptake and activization of immune response pathways. Furthermore, PF3 showed better immune enhancement and acceptable biosafety equivalent to that of aluminum adjuvant. In addition, no obvious changes of PF3 were observed in size and zeta potential after 12 weeks storage at 4 and 37°C, demonstrating its high stability

Indexed as

aluminum adjuvantginsenoside Rg1hepatitis B surface antigennano adjuvantPF3

Identifiers

PMID35620473
PMCPMC9127465
OpenAlexW4280583063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.