Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35620316›Full record

ArticleBiomedical reports2022

A meta-analysis to identify factors associated with CPAP machine purchasing in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Bundit Sawunyavisuth, Chetta Ngamjarus, Kittisak Sawanyawisuth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bundit SawunyavisuthDepartment of Marketing, Faculty of Business Administration and Accountancy, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Chetta NgamjarusDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Kittisak SawanyawisuthDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease and related to several cardiovascular diseases. Treatment with a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine is effective. However, not all patients with OSA purchase a CPAP machine for personal use. Previous studies showed different predictors of CPAP machine purchasing in patients with OSA. The present study aimed to summarize and identify predictors of CPAP purchasing using meta-analysis. The study was conducted using factors associated with CPAP purchasing in patients with OSA. The types of studies conducted in adult patients with OSA included: Randomized controlled trials, observational studies or descriptive studies comparing factors between those who purchased CPAP and those who did not. A total of five databases, including PubMed, Central database, Scopus, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science, were searched, and the final search was performed on February 8, 2021. Predictors for CPAP purchasing were determined. There were 598 articles from five databases, which met the inclusion criteria. After duplicated article removal, 390 articles were included in the screening process. There were 12 eligible articles for full text evaluation, and of those, eight studies met the study criteria with 1,605 patients from four countries. There were 11 variables that were available for a comparison between those who purchased the CPAP machine and those who did not, and six factors were different between the two groups: Age, years of education, income, smoking, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score and apnea hypopnea index/respiratory disturbance index (AHI/RDI). The AHI/RDI was significantly different between the two groups, with the highest mean difference of 10.40 events/h (95% CI, 4.95-15.86). Patients who purchased CPAP were older (1.11 years), had more years of education (0.93 years), smoked more (1.15 pack/year), and had both higher ESS (0.61) and AHI/RDI (10.40) than those who did not purchase CPAP. Additionally, those who purchased CPAP had a 1.47 times higher income than those who did not. In conclusion, specific personal customer and clinical factors were related to the decision of CPAP purchase in patients with OSA.

Indexed as

ageapnea hypopnea indexincomerespiratory disturbance indexsmoking

Identifiers

PMID35620316
PMCPMC9112380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.