ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2022
On the Minimal Amount of EEG Data Required for Learning Distinctive Human Features for Task-Dependent Biometric Applications.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-Efficient EEG-Based Person Identification via Time-Interval-Based Multi-Positive Contrastive Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Brain Signal for Secure EEG Biometric Authentication: A Comprehensive Survey.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Individual differences in the empathic experience of pain: An EEG and machine learning approach.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Balancing noise reduction and neural signature preservation in EEG biometrics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- EEG-based emotion recognition using graph convolutional neural network with dual attention mechanism.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Modeling Cognitive Load as a Self-Supervised Brain Rate with Electroencephalography and Deep Learning.Brain sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biometrics is the process of measuring and analyzing human characteristics to verify a given person's identity. Most real-world applications rely on unique human traits such as fingerprints or iris. However, among these unique human characteristics for biometrics, the use of Electroencephalogram (EEG) stands out given its high inter-subject variability. Recent advances in Deep Learning and a deeper understanding of EEG processing methods have led to the development of models that accurately discriminate unique individuals. However, it is still uncertain how much EEG data is required to train such models. This work aims at determining the minimal amount of training data required to develop a robust EEG-based biometric model (+95% and +99% testing accuracies) from a subject for a task-dependent task. This goal is achieved by performing and analyzing 11,780 combinations of training sizes, by employing various neural network-based learning techniques of increasing complexity, and feature extraction methods on the affective EEG-based DEAP dataset. Findings suggest that if Power Spectral Density or Wavelet Energy features are extracted from the artifact-free EEG signal, 1 and 3 s of data per subject is enough to achieve +95% and +99% accuracy, respectively. These findings contributes to the body of knowledge by paving a way for the application of EEG to real-world ecological biometric applications and by demonstrating methods to learn the minimal amount of data required for such applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.