ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2022
Immune responses of patients without cancer recurrence after a cancer vaccine over a long term.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid-Turnaround Co-Administration of mRNA-Based MHC-I and MHC-II-Restricted Neoantigens Enhances Immune Responses of Antigen-Specific CD8Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Advancing Breast Cancer Treatment: The Role of Immunotherapy and Cancer Vaccines in Overcoming Therapeutic Challenges.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Exploring the Potential of Humoral Immune Response to CommensalBiomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to clarify the humoral and cellular immune responses of patients with cancer who experienced no recurrence over a long term after receiving a cancer vaccine. The immune kinetics were investigated in response to a personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) among 44 Japanese patients without an active tumor at entry to the vaccination: Lung adenocarcinoma (n=11); colon (n=18); and breast cancer (n=15) (9, 10, 12, 8 and 5 patients with stage I, II, III and IV recurrences, respectively). The patients' immunoglobulin G (IgG) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activities were measured using a multiplexed Luminex assay and an interferon-γ release assay, respectively. There were no severe adverse events related to the PPV other than a grade III injection site reaction. A potent boost in IgG or CTL at the end of the 1st vaccination cycle was observed in 77% of the patients (n=84). The IgG levels were sustained throughout the follow-up period, whereas the CTL levels declined and were transient. A total of 37 of the 44 patients (84%) had no recurrence, with a median follow-up of 67.6 months (interquartile range, 45.6-82.8 months). Overall, the PPV induced long-term humoral immunity with transient cellular immunity in the majority of patients with cancer without an active tumor at their entry to the PPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.