Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35620173›Full record

ReviewCurrent forestry reports2021

The Vision of Managing for Pest-Resistant Landscapes: Realistic or Utopic?

Daniel D Kneeshaw, Brian R Sturtevant, Louis DeGrandpé, Enrique Doblas-Miranda, Patrick M A James, Dominique Tardif, Philip J Burton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current forestry reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel D KneeshawCentre for Forest Research, University of Québec in Montréal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2585-8436
Brian R SturtevantNorthern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Rhinelander, WI USA.
Louis DeGrandpéLaurentian Forestry Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Quebec City, Canada.
Enrique Doblas-MirandaCREAF, E08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, Spain.
Patrick M A JamesUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.
Dominique TardifCentre for Forest Research, University of Québec in Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Philip J BurtonUniversity of Northern British Columbia, Terrace, BC Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Forest managers have long suggested that forests can be made more resilient to insect pests by reducing the abundance of hosts, yet this has rarely been done. The goal of our paper is to review whether recent scientific evidence supports forest manipulation to decrease vulnerability. To achieve this goal, we first ask if outbreaks of forest insect pests have been more severe in recent decades. Next, we assess the relative importance of climate change and forest management-induced changes in forest composition/structure in driving these changes in severity. Recent Findings: Forest structure and composition continue to be implicated in pest outbreak severity. Mechanisms, however, remain elusive. Recent research elucidates how forest compositional and structural diversity at neighbourhood, stand, and landscape scales can increase forest resistance to outbreaks. Many recent outbreaks of herbivorous forest insects have been unprecedented in terms of duration and spatial extent. Climate change may be a contributing factor, but forest structure and composition have been clearly identified as contributing to these unprecedented outbreaks. Summary: Current research supports using silviculture to create

Indexed as

Climate changeForest managementForest resistance to insect pestsSocial barriers to managementStructural and compositional diversityUnprecedented outbreaks

Identifiers

PMID35620173
PMCPMC8050513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.