Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35620116›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2022

A more unstable resting-state functional network in cognitively declining multiple sclerosis.

Tommy A A Broeders, Linda Douw, Anand J C Eijlers, Iris Dekker, Bernard M J Uitdehaag, Frederik Barkhof, Hanneke E Hulst, Christiaan H Vinkers, Jeroen J G Geurts, Menno M Schoonheim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: from phenomenology to neurobiological mechanisms.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Tommy A A BroedersDepartment of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2884-2827
Linda DouwDepartment of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7058-4062
Anand J C EijlersDepartment of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Iris DekkerDepartment of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bernard M J UitdehaagDepartment of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frederik BarkhofDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanneke E HulstDepartment of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christiaan H VinkersDepartment of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-0744
Jeroen J G GeurtsDepartment of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-3748
Menno M SchoonheimDepartment of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2504-6959
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is common in people with multiple sclerosis and strongly affects their daily functioning. Reports have linked disturbed cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis to changes in the organization of the functional network. In a healthy brain, communication between brain regions and which network a region belongs to is continuously and dynamically adapted to enable adequate cognitive function. However, this dynamic network adaptation has not been investigated in multiple sclerosis, and longitudinal network data remain particularly rare. Therefore, the aim of this study was to longitudinally identify patterns of dynamic network reconfigurations that are related to the worsening of cognitive decline in multiple sclerosis. Resting-state functional MRI and cognitive scores (expanded Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological tests) were acquired in 230 patients with multiple sclerosis and 59 matched healthy controls, at baseline (mean disease duration: 15 years) and at 5-year follow-up. A sliding-window approach was used for functional MRI analyses, where brain regions were dynamically assigned to one of seven literature-based subnetworks. Dynamic reconfigurations of subnetworks were characterized using measures of promiscuity (number of subnetworks switched to), flexibility (number of switches), cohesion (mutual switches) and disjointedness (independent switches). Cross-sectional differences between cognitive groups and longitudinal changes were assessed, as well as relations with structural damage and performance on specific cognitive domains. At baseline, 23% of patients were cognitively impaired (≥2/7 domains

Indexed as

cognitionconnectivitydynamicmultiple sclerosisnetwork

Identifiers

PMID35620116
PMCPMC9128379
OpenAlexW4223437547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.