Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35619937›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2022

Carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: Risk factors, prevention, and management.

Rahul K Sharma, Alexandria L Irace, Jonathan B Overdevest, David A Gudis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis (2024).World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Anatomical Variations in Nasal Cavities and Paranasal Sinuses on Computed Tomography in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: Risk factors, prevention, and management.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rahul K SharmaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital New York New York USA.
Alexandria L IraceDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital New York New York USA.
Jonathan B OverdevestDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital New York New York USA.
David A GudisDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital New York New York USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic approaches for sinus and skull base surgery are increasing in popularity. The objective of this narrative review is to characterize risk factors for internal carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES), highlight preventative measures, and illustrate key management principles. Data Sources: Comprehensive literature review. Methods: Relevant literature was reviewed using PubMed/MEDLINE. Results: Carotid artery injury in EES is rare, with most studies reporting an incidence below 0.1%. Anatomic aberrancies, wide dissection margins, as well as specific provider and hospital factors, may increase the risk of injury. Multidisciplinary teams, comprehensive preoperative imaging, patient risk assessment, and formal training in vascular emergencies may reduce the risk. Management protocols should emphasize proper visualization of the injury site, fluid replacement, rapid packing, angiography, and endovascular techniques to achieve hemostasis. Conclusions: While EES is a relatively safe procedure, carotid artery injury is a devastating complication that warrants full consideration in surgical planning. Important preventative measures include identifying patients with notable risk factors and obtaining preoperative imaging. Multidisciplinary teams and management protocols are ultimately necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

carotid injurycomplicationsinternal carotidpituitarypituitary adenomapituitary tumorskull base surgerysurgical outcomestransphenoidal

Identifiers

PMID35619937
PMCPMC9126167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.