Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35619934›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2022

Simulation training in endoscopic skull base surgery: A scoping review.

Joel James, Alexandria L Irace, David A Gudis, Jonathan B Overdevest

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Simulation training in endoscopic skull base surgery: A scoping review.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joel JamesCity University of New York School of Medicine New York New York USA.
Alexandria L IraceDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York New York USA.
David A GudisDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York New York USA.
Jonathan B OverdevestDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York New York USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Proficiency in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery requires both substantial baseline training and progressive lifelong learning. Endoscopic simulation models continue to evolve in an effort to optimize trainee education and preoperative preparation and improve surgical outcomes. The current scoping review systematically reviews all available literature and synthesizes the current paradigms of simulation models for endoscopic skull base surgery training and skill enhancement. Methods: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases. Studies were categorized according to the type of simulation models investigated. Results: We identified 238 unique references, with 55 studies ultimately meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 19 studies described cadaveric dissection models, 17 discussed three-dimensional (3D) printed models, 14 examined virtual surgical planning and augmented reality-based models, and five 5 articles described task trainers. Conclusions: There are a wide variety of simulation models for endoscopic skull base surgery, including high-fidelity cadaveric, virtual reality, and 3D-printed models. These models are an asset for trainee development and preoperative surgical preparation.

Indexed as

resident educationskull base surgerysurgical simulation trainingvirtual realityvirtual surgical planning

Identifiers

PMID35619934
PMCPMC9126166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.