Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35619902›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Breast Cancer Prognosis Based on Depression-Related Genes.

Xuan Wang, Neng Wang, Linda L D Zhong, Kexin Su, Shengqi Wang, Yifeng Zheng, Bowen Yang, Juping Zhang, Bo Pan, Wei Yang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrative bioinformatic and experimental analysis reveals prognostic and immunological roles of psychological stress-related genes in skin cutaneous melanoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xuan WangState Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Neng WangState Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Linda L D ZhongGuangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Joint Lab on Chinese Medicine and Immune Disease Research, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Kexin SuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shengqi WangState Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yifeng ZhengState Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Bowen YangState Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Juping ZhangState Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Bo PanState Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Wei YangAtrius Health, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Burlington, MA, United States.
Zhiyu WangState Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depression plays a significant role in mediating breast cancer recurrence and metastasis. However, a precise risk model is lacking to evaluate the potential impact of depression on breast cancer prognosis. In this study, we established a depression-related gene (DRG) signature that can predict overall survival (OS) and elucidate its correlation with pathological parameters and sensitivity to therapy in breast cancer. Methods: The model training and validation assays were based on the analyses of 1,096 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and 2,969 patients from GSE96058. A risk signature was established through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Results: Ten DRGs were determined to construct the risk signature. Multivariate analysis revealed that the signature was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated good performance of the model in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS, particularly for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the high-risk group, the proportion of immunosuppressive cells, including M0 macrophages, M2 macrophages, and neutrophils, was higher than that in the low-risk group. Furthermore, low-risk patients responded better to chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Finally, a nomogram integrating risk score, age, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and molecular subtypes were established, and it showed good agreement between the predicted and observed OS. Conclusion: The 10-gene risk model not only highlights the significance of depression in breast cancer prognosis but also provides a novel gene-testing tool to better prevent the potential adverse impact of depression on breast cancer prognosis.

Indexed as

breast cancerdepressionnomogramoverall survivalpredictive model

Identifiers

PMID35619902
PMCPMC9128552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.