Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35619741›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie2022

The Older Sandwich Generation Across European Welfare Regimes: Demographic and Social Considerations.

Marco Albertini, Aviad Tur-Sinai, Noah Lewin-Epstein, Merril Silverstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Aging in aging societies: the transformation of life courses and how we study them.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marco AlbertiniDepartment of Political and Social Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0344-3002
Aviad Tur-SinaiDepartment of Health Systems Management, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4802-455X
Noah Lewin-EpsteinDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7679-7154
Merril SilversteinDepartment of Sociology, Maxwell School, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9857-2231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lengthening of the amount of time adult children depend on their parents' support and rising longevity have pushed scholars to devote increasing attention to the phenomenon of older sandwich family generations. This brief report develops a descriptive portrait of the prevalence of being demographically and socially sandwiched in the population aged 50 or more years, in Europe. It is shown that the prevalence of social sandwiching is highly sensitive to the types of support utilized to operationalize the concept; also, differences between welfare and transfer regimes are significantly affected by different operationalizations. Next, the analyses highlight the dynamic nature of social sandwiching over the adult life cycle, and show that demographic events and the changing needs of older parents are the main drivers of moving in/out the status of socially sandwiched. Support to adult children is ubiquitous in all European societies. Among the pivot generation family solidarity prevails over competition, but children enjoy a strategic advantage when older parents are in good health.

Indexed as

Family solidarityIntergenerational supportPopulation agingSandwich generationSHARE

Identifiers

PMID35619741
PMCPMC9127010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.