ArticleInternational journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology2022
Cost-utility-safety analysis of alternative intradermal versus classical intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination.
Article in International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review.Journal of global health · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Preclinical evaluation of performance, safety and usability of VAX-ID®, a novel intradermal injection device.Vaccine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 immunization has been shown to be effective in the prevention of COVID-19. Traditionally, two vaccination doses given by intramuscular injection are required. Many scientists present ideas for an alternative administration of COVID-19 for reducing the cost and solving the problem of insufficient COVID-19 vaccine supply. Regarding the new alternative vaccine administration, the important consideration is on cost, utility and safety. Herein, we performed cost-utility-safety analysis of alternative intradermal versus classical intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination. From cost analysis, a 80% cost reduction was derived from using intradermal COVID-19 vaccine administration comparing to intramuscular vaccination. Additional, cost-utility and cost-safety analysis also show that the cost per utility and cost per safety values for intradermal vaccination are lower than those of intramuscular vaccination. According to current research, intradermal immunization is a viable alternative to traditional intramuscular COVID-19 vaccine and may even be superior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35619662PMC9123469W4285743201What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.