ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2022
The development and evaluation of a web-based complex intervention: The caring for couples coping with colorectal cancer "4Cs: CRC" program.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This article aims to systematically present the completed process of developing and evaluating a web-based complex intervention called 'Caring for Couples Coping with Colorectal Cancer "4Cs: CRC" program'; summarize the findings of this integrated supportive program; and provide valuable experience and suggestions for future interventions. Methods: The integrated 4Cs: CRC program was guided by the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, which has widely been used to develop and evaluate complex interventions. Three stages were completed for the program development, namely: (1) developing a complex intervention; (2) assessing feasibility; and (3) evaluating the complex intervention. Results: Based on a series of interactive studies and a dyadic theoretical framework, the 4Cs: CRC program was developed into an integrated supportive six-week program that includes five weekly web-based interventions, as well as three biweekly face-to-face sessions. In particular, an online platform was designed to provide web-based interventions for couples facing colorectal cancer (CRC). Both the pilot study and qualitative process evaluation showed the program's preliminary feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness. Conclusions: Under the guidance of the MRC framework, the 4Cs: CRC program was developed based on multiple interacting components. The program was initially proven to be feasible, acceptable, and effective at supporting CRC couples in mainland China, but requires further improvements according to the qualitative process evaluation results. More importantly, a full-scale randomized controlled trial is required to further explore the program's effectiveness in a wider population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.