ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2022
Need differences by treatment phases between patients with colorectal cancer and their caregivers: A text mining analysis.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- FamCASP-A Support Model for Individualised Support for Family Members in Routine Cancer Care: Development and Validation.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
- Aiming for survival: a qualitative single case study of support for family members across the care process in outpatient colorectal cancer care.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Family members' conceptions of their supportive care needs across the colorectal cancer trajectory - A phenomenographic study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Cancer literacy among Jordanian colorectal cancer survivors and informal carers: Qualitative explorations.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Prospective Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Patients after Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer: A 12-Month Cohort Observation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To improve the quality of life and health outcomes of an increasing number of colorectal cancer patients and their caregivers, the specific needs of both should be understood across the cancer treatment trajectory. This study attempted to identify the supportive needs of patients and caregivers during each treatment phase. Methods: Using text mining, posts from a South Korean internet self-help support group for colorectal cancer were classified by assigning labels to the terms extracted according to the poster, treatment phase, and support type. The extracted terms were then classified based on term frequency, with higher term frequency indicating higher need. Results: Both caregivers and patients showed the highest term frequencies during the treatment phase. Caregivers had more high-ranking terms that were ranked higher than patients, indicating high support needs. In addition, the terms regarding treatments and diseases were ranked high. In the pre-treatment phase, test-related needs were ranked higher for both caregivers and patients. Meanwhile, patients had more highly ranked terms in the post-treatment phase, showing their high need in this phase, especially terms related to post-treatment symptoms. Caregivers had higher term frequencies of food intake during the post-treatment phase. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the needs of colorectal cancer patients and their caregivers were not always consistent in each treatment phase. Therefore, the needs of both patients and caregivers should be considered separately in each treatment phase and supportive interventions should be provided accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.