Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35619638›Full record

ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022

Sex-specific aspects of venous thromboembolism: What is new and what is next?

Luuk J J Scheres, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Suzanne C Cannegieter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of Disease-Specific Treatment and Non-Selective Beta Blockers on Risk of PVT in Cirrhotic Patients With HCV or PBC.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  5. Sex Differences in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sex-specific aspects of venous thromboembolism: What is new and what is next?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. D-Dimer Variability Predicts Venous Thromboembolism in Postoperative Fracture Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luuk J J ScheresDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-5520
Astrid van Hylckama VliegDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands.
Suzanne C CannegieterDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4707-2303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Men seem to have a higher intrinsic risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than women, regardless of age. To date, this difference has not been explained. By integrating state-of-the-art research presented at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress of 2021 with the available literature, we address potential explanations for this intriguing risk difference between men and women. We discuss the role of exogenous and endogenous sex hormones as the most important known sex-specific determinants of VTE risk. In addition, we highlight clues on the role of sex hormones and VTE risk from clinical scenarios such as pregnancy and the polycystic ovary syndrome. Furthermore, we address new potential sex-specific risk factors and unanswered research questions, which could provide more insight in the intrinsic risk difference between men and women, such as body height and differences in body fat distribution, leading to dysregulation of metabolism and inflammation.

Indexed as

body fat distributionhormonesmetabolismsexvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID35619638
PMCPMC9127145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.