Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35619190›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2022

External validation of 5A score model for predicting in-hospital mortality among the accidental hypothermia patients: JAAM-Hypothermia study 2018-2019 secondary analysis.

Yohei Okada, Tasuku Matsuyama, Kei Hayashida, Shuhei Takauji, Jun Kanda, Shoji Yokobori

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Accidental hypothermia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Difference between 5A score and the HOPE score.Journal of intensive care · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yohei OkadaJapan Association of Acute Medicine Heatstroke and Hypothermia Surveillance Committee, Tokyo, Japan. yokada-kyf@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2266-476X
Tasuku MatsuyamaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kei HayashidaJapan Association of Acute Medicine Heatstroke and Hypothermia Surveillance Committee, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuhei TakaujiJapan Association of Acute Medicine Heatstroke and Hypothermia Surveillance Committee, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun KandaJapan Association of Acute Medicine Heatstroke and Hypothermia Surveillance Committee, Tokyo, Japan.
Shoji YokoboriJapan Association of Acute Medicine Heatstroke and Hypothermia Surveillance Committee, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 5A score including five components "Age, Activities of daily living, Arrest, Acidemia and Albumin" was developed as an easy-to-use screening tool for predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with accidental hypothermia. However, the external validity of the 5A score has not yet been evaluated. We aimed to perform an external validation of the 5A score model.

methodThis secondary analysis of the multicenter, prospective cohort Japanese Association for Acute Medicine-Hypothermia Study (2018-2019), which was conducted at 87 and 89 institutions throughout Japan, collected data from December 2018 to February 2019 and from December 2019 to February 2020. Adult accidental hypothermia patients whose body temperature was 35 °C or less were included in this analysis. The probability of in-hospital mortality was calculated using a logistic regression model of the 5A score. The albumin was not recorded in this database; thus, it was imputed by estimation. Predictions were compared with actual observations to evaluate the calibration of the model. Furthermore, decision-curve analysis was used to evaluate the clinical usefulness.

resultsOf the 1363 patients registered in the database, data of 1139 accidental hypothermia patients were included for analysis. The median [interquartile range] age was 79 [68-87] years, and there were 625 men (54.9%) in the study cohort. The predicted probability and actual observation by risk groups produced the following results: low 7% (5.4-8.6), mild 19.1% (17.4-20.8), moderate 33.2% (29.9-36.5), and high 61.9% (55.9-67.9) predicted risks, and the low 12.4% (60/483), mild 17.7% (59/334), moderate 32.6% (63/193), and high 69% (89/129) observed mortality. These results indicated that the model was well calibrated. Decision-curve analysis visually indicated the clinical utility of the 5A score model.

conclusionThis study indicated that the 5A score model using estimated albumin value has external validity in a completely different dataset from that used for the 5A model development. The 5A score is potentially helpful to predict the mortality risk and may be one of the valuable information for discussing the treatment strategy with patients and their family members.

Indexed as

5A scoreAccidental hypothermiaExternal validationIn-hospital mortalityPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID35619190
PMCPMC9134674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.