Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35619110›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2022

Consultations' demand for a hospital palliative care unit: how to increase appropriateness? Implementing and evaluating a multicomponent educational intervention aimed at increase palliative care complexity perception skill.

Silvia Tanzi, Gianfranco Martucci, Cristina Autelitano, Sara Alquati, Carlo Peruselli, Giovanna Artioli

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia TanziPalliative Care Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Gianfranco MartucciLocal Program of Palliative Care, AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy. gfmartucci@gmail.com.
Cristina AutelitanoPalliative Care Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Sara AlquatiPalliative Care Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Carlo PeruselliItalian Society of Palliative Care, Milan, Italy.
Giovanna ArtioliPalliative Care Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITAzienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITItalian Society of Physiotherapy · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlanned, multidisciplinary teams' discussions of cases are common in cancer care, but their impact on patients' outcome is not always clear. Palliative care (PC) needs might emerge long before the last weeks of life. Many palliative care patients could be managed from the usual care staff, if appropriately trained; specialist palliative care should be provided to patients with more complex needs. Staff needs adequate training, so that only patients presenting a higher complexity are properly referred to the second level ("specialized") PC services. In the considered hospital setting, "tumour boards" (multidisciplinary discussions) refer often to a low number of patients. Overall complexity of patients' needs is hardly considered.

methodsA mixed method pilot study with data triangulation of professionals' interviews and an independently structured evaluation of complexity of referred patients, before and after the intervention, using the PALCOM instrument. We trained four teams of professionals to deliver first-level palliation and to refer patients with complex needs detected in multidisciplinary discussions. A multicomponent, first level PC educational intervention, including information technology's adaptation, a training course, and bedside training was offered from the specialized PC Services, to all the HPs involved in multidisciplinary pancreas, lung, ovarian, and liver tumour boards.

resultsWhile the level of complexity of referred patients did not increase, trainees seemed to develop a better understanding of palliative care and a higher sensitivity to palliative needs. The number of referred patients increased, but patients' complexity did not. Qualitative data showed that professionals seemed to be more aware of the complexity of PC needs. A "meaning shift" was perceived, specifically on the referral process (e.g., "when" and "for what" referring to specialist PC) and on the teams' increased focus on patients' needs. The training, positively received, was adapted to trainees' needs and observations that led also to organizational modifications.

conclusionsOur multicomponent intervention positively impacted the number of referrals but not the patients' complexity (measured with the PALCOM instrument). Hospital staff does not easily recognize that patients may have PC needs significantly earlier than at the end of life.

Indexed as

Palliative CareReferral and ConsultationHospitalsHumansPerceptionPilot ProjectsCare pathwayComplexityHospitalMultidisciplinary discussionsOncologyPalliative careTrainingTumour board

Identifiers

PMID35619110
PMCPMC9133822
OpenAlexW4281562768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.