Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35619093›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

The experience of giving birth: a prospective cohort in a French perinatal network.

Chloé Arthuis, Juliette LeGoff, Marion Olivier, Anne-Sophie Coutin, Nathalie Banaskiewicz, Philippe Gillard, Guillaume Legendre, Norbert Winer

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Consent for interventions during childbirth: A national population-based study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chloé ArthuisService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, UMR 1280, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, CIC Et Hôpital Mère-Enfant-Adolescent, NUN, INRAE, PhAN, 44000, Nantes, France. chloearthuis@gmail.com.
Juliette LeGoffService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, UMR 1280, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, CIC Et Hôpital Mère-Enfant-Adolescent, NUN, INRAE, PhAN, 44000, Nantes, France.
Marion OlivierRéseau Sécurité Naissance - Naître Ensemble, Réseau de Santé Périnatale Des Pays de La Loire, 3 rue Marguerite Thibert, 44200, Nantes, France.
Anne-Sophie CoutinRéseau Sécurité Naissance - Naître Ensemble, Réseau de Santé Périnatale Des Pays de La Loire, 3 rue Marguerite Thibert, 44200, Nantes, France.
Nathalie BanaskiewiczRéseau Sécurité Naissance - Naître Ensemble, Réseau de Santé Périnatale Des Pays de La Loire, 3 rue Marguerite Thibert, 44200, Nantes, France.
Philippe GillardRéseau Sécurité Naissance - Naître Ensemble, Réseau de Santé Périnatale Des Pays de La Loire, 3 rue Marguerite Thibert, 44200, Nantes, France.
Guillaume LegendreService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers, France.
Norbert WinerService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, UMR 1280, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, CIC Et Hôpital Mère-Enfant-Adolescent, NUN, INRAE, PhAN, 44000, Nantes, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess women's positive and negative perceptions after giving birth. The secondary objectives were to identify the women who had a negative perception of their delivery, define the risk factors, and propose actions that maternity units can take to improve their management. METHODS/

designThis study was a multicenter, prospective cohort, conducted in 23 French maternity units constituting one perinatal network, in 2019. All adult women who understood French and gave birth between February 1 and September 27, 2019, were eligible. The exclusion criterion was the woman's objection to participation. Validated self-administered questionnaire (QACE) was sent by email 6 weeks after the child's birth. The main outcome was the experience of childbirth, assessed on a scale of 0 to 10. A good experience was defined by a score ≥ 8/10, and a poor experience by a score < 5. A multinomial logistic regression model, expressed by cumulative proportional odds ratios, were used to determine the factors that might have affected women's experiences during childbirth.

resultsTwo thousand one hundred and thirty-fifth women completed the questionnaire, for a participation rate of 49.6%. Overall, 70.7% (n = 1501/2121) of the women reported a good experience, including 38% (n = 807/2121) who graded their experience with the maximum score of 10. On the other hand, 7.3% (n = 156) of the women reported a poor experience. Vaginal delivery (aOR 3.93, 95%CI, 3.04-5.08) and satisfactory management (aOR 11.35 (7.69-16.75)) were the principal determining factors of a positive experience. Epidural analgesia increased the feeling of failure (aOR 5.64, 95%CI, 2.75-13.66). Receiving information and being asked for and agreeing to consent improved the global experience (P = 0.03).

conclusionThe Identikit picture of the woman associated with a poor experience of childbirth shows a nullipara who had a complication during her pregnancy, gave birth after induction of labor, or by cesarean or operative vaginal delivery, with the newborn transferred for pediatric care, and medical management considered unsatisfactory.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricParturitionAdultChildCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective StudiesChildbirth experienceObstetric consentObstetric violencePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35619093
PMCPMC9134581
OpenAlexW4281677115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.