Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35619091›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Home blood pressure monitoring and adherence in patients with hypertension on primary prevention treatment: a survey of 1026 patients in general medicine in the Auvergne region.

Jéromine Trefond, Lucie Hermet, Céline Lambert, Hélène Vaillant-Roussel, Denis Pouchain, Thibault Ménini, Bruno Pereira, Philippe Vorilhon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring Hypertension Patient Engagement Using mHealth. A Scoping Review.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jéromine TrefondDépartement de Médecine Générale, Université Clermont Auvergne, UFR Médecine, 28 place Henri Dunant, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. jeromine.trefond@uca.fr.
Lucie HermetDépartement de Médecine Générale, Université Clermont Auvergne, UFR Médecine, 28 place Henri Dunant, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Céline LambertBiostatistics Unit, DRCI, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Hélène Vaillant-RousselDépartement de Médecine Générale, Université Clermont Auvergne, UFR Médecine, 28 place Henri Dunant, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Denis PouchainDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, François Rabelais University, BP 3223, 37032, Tours Cedex, France.
Thibault MéniniDépartement de Médecine Générale, Université Clermont Auvergne, UFR Médecine, 28 place Henri Dunant, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bruno PereiraBiostatistics Unit, DRCI, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Philippe VorilhonDépartement de Médecine Générale, Université Clermont Auvergne, UFR Médecine, 28 place Henri Dunant, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHome blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) could improve blood pressure control through therapeutic adherence. The main objective of this study was to determine the link between HBPM used by hypertensive patients treated in primary care and their medication adherence.

methodsCross-sectional comparative study conducted in the Auvergne region from June to November 2016. Patients were recruited by general practitioners (GPs) selected at random. Adherence was evaluated according to the Girerd score.

resultsFrom a sample of eighty-two GPs including 1026 patients, 45% of patients reported owning an HBPM device. Among these, 18% knew the rule of 3 (3 measurements in the morning and 3 in the evening for 3 days) recommended by the French State Health Authority. There was no difference in adherence between patients using HBPM and those who did not. Patients with HBPM using the rule of 3 reported better adherence than patients without the device (p = 0.06), and those who did not perform self-measurements according to the rule of 3 (p = 0.01). Patients who used HBPM according to the rule of 3 were older (p = 0.006) and less smokers (p = 0.001) than the others. Their GPs were more often GP teachers (p < 0.001) who practiced in rural areas (p = 0.001).

conclusionThe statistical link between medication adherence and HBPM for patients who apply the rule of 3, emphasizes the importance of the GP educating the patient on the proper use of HBPM.

Indexed as

General PracticeHypertensionBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPrimary PreventionAdherenceCross-sectional surveyGeneral practiceGuidelinesHome blood pressure monitoringHypertension

Identifiers

PMID35619091
PMCPMC9137195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.