Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35618934›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2022

Addressing the cost of chronic and episodic migraine and its main drivers: a short-term longitudinal analysis from a third-level Italian center.

Alberto Raggi, Licia Grazzi, Erika Guastafierro, Alessia Marcassoli, Marco Passavanti, Danilo Antonio Montisano, Domenico D'Amico

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Global & regional health technology assessment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto RaggiUO Neurologia Salute Pubblica E Disabilità, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy. alberto.raggi@istituto-besta.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7433-7779
Licia GrazziUO Neuroalgologia - Centro Cefalee, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6535-1109
Erika GuastafierroUO Neurologia Salute Pubblica E Disabilità, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5051-0207
Alessia MarcassoliUO Neurologia Salute Pubblica E Disabilità, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5003-1409
Marco PassavantiUO Neurologia Salute Pubblica E Disabilità, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0744-7051
Danilo Antonio MontisanoUO Neuroalgologia - Centro Cefalee, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-2045
Domenico D'AmicoUO Neuroalgologia - Centro Cefalee, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5016-9301
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute RF-2016-02364801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic migraine (CM) is one of the most disabling neurological diseases, often associated to medication overuse headache (MOH). These patients make high use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, and experience high work-related indirect costs. The aim of this study was to address and compare the main driver of cost associated to CM-MOH and EM, and to evaluate the effect of improvement in migraine profile on disease cost.

methodsWe selected patients with baseline CM-MOH who reverted to an episodic pattern by 3 months after structured withdrawal. Paired sample t-test was used to explore the variation in headache frequency and its costs. Regression models were run to address the impact of single cost categories on total migraine cost.

resultsA total of 261 patients were included. Significant reductions in headache frequency and its costs were observed, with the exception of medical prophylaxis cost. The cost of migraine from chronic to episodic pattern is reduced by 533€ per month and 80% of this reduction is accountable to reduced indirect costs, i.e., loss of productive time.

conclusionsThe results of our study open to future considerations on future approaches to the treatment of CM-MOH in which new migraine-specific treatments, i.e., monoclonal antibodies, should be combined with other pharmacological and non-pharmacological ones.

Indexed as

Headache Disorders, SecondaryMigraine DisordersCost of IllnessHeadacheHumansItalyChronic migraineCostEpisodic migraineLoss of productive timeProphylaxisWithdrawal treatment

Identifiers

PMID35618934
OpenAlexW4281632079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.